Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passenger Plane Crash in Queens NYC!
Fox News ^

Posted on 11/12/2001 5:30:38 AM PST by Attila_the_Hun

AA Passenger plane has crashed in Queens, live video on Fox News... Developing!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaflight587; flight587; harbour
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 961-966 next last
To: SirAllen; Martin Tell; oldglory
Martin Tell: "What does Nostradamus have to say?"

"Anything you want him to."

LOL!!!! I love it!

301 posted on 11/12/2001 6:22:27 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
How about a bomb on the wing... next to engine ..... or in engine.... with a detonator that is set off by increasing altitude?
302 posted on 11/12/2001 6:22:40 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Yuo are doing a good thing consolidating threads, thanks. It is impossible to follow more than one thread in a situation like this.
303 posted on 11/12/2001 6:22:48 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

Comment #304 Removed by Moderator

To: Silas
Ok folks. This is why people think right wingers are nuts. This is why people think freepers are nuts. Just like liberals who have knee jerk reactions to issues, people here seem to have knee jerk reactions also. WAIT, get more info, then make an informed decision. Have a knee jerk reaction, and you say things like "a UFO shot a transmorgifier ray at the airplane which caused it to crash. Yasir Arafat was in town, so obviously the aliens were targeting him."
305 posted on 11/12/2001 6:22:53 AM PST by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
A timed bomb is EXACTLY what this sounds like. The plane was supposed to leave at 8:00 a.m. By 9:15 it would have been over water and no traces of the plane, the recorders, or the passengers would have been found. This is Lockerbie all over again - remember Pan Am 103 was also late and changed course, which was why the bomb exploded with the plane over land instead of water. Stupid terrorists again. They seem to be completely dense about the fact that planes rarely leave on time, especially when they have a full complement of passengers going abroad, as this one did today. The black boxes will be recovered from this plane which will tell us a lot, just as with Pan Am 103, and if there was a bomb, the materials will be found in the wreckage.

Eyewitness on NBA reported seeing something fall off the plane and a small fire, then it went down nose first. Dr. Arnot saying this sounds very similar to the Chicago DC-10 crash.

306 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:03 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Fred25
Does anyone know where Mike Moran lives? Is it between 119th and 129th Rockaway Beach??
307 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:04 AM PST by BaBaStooey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Dirk McQuickly
Sounds like a bomb to me. I'm taking the train to my in-laws for Christmas for this very reason -- they don't screen all the bags for explosives -- THAT's insane. after the O'Hare incident, my wife and I looked at each other and said, "F--k it, we're taking the train."

I'm all for train travel since the railroad is the industry that puts food on our particular table but they don't screen ANY bags on trains so danger could lurk there as well.

308 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:23 AM PST by WomanofStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: michigander

Please copy, email, print, send to any American you care to. Never forget.

Does anybody have a link to the article about George "Steffy" Stephanopolous referring to the "BOMBING" of TWA Flight 800? I want to post it again.
Please either post it or freepmail me the link. Thanks!

309 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:32 AM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Silas
Ease up on that ol' accelerator, friend. There'll be time for recriminations later....
310 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:41 AM PST by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
CENTER FUEL TANK!!!

Does an Airbus even have one?

311 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:48 AM PST by E.Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
It would be a big coincidence IF IT WASN'T a terrorist attack. Anybody who pays attention to attacks in Israel knows that Arab terrorists like to attack on anniversaries and they favor Monday mornings.

You are correct. There is wisdom in the saying, "perception is everything." For the reasons you state and more, even if no terrorism was involved in this crash, our militant Muslim enemies will read a divine message into it. They will view this as a message of encouragement from Allah to continue the struggle.

Just as we have are on the verge of breaking the spirit and morale of the pro-Taliban forces completely, this happens. It might serve to be short-lived morale boost, but it will result in a morale boost nonetheless.

A terrible and unfortunate incident all the way round.

312 posted on 11/12/2001 6:23:53 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

Comment #313 Removed by Moderator

To: wheezer
People are very resistant to this idea because "eyewitness" testimony has been built up to a level of infallibility in our legal system, but every psychologist knows that eyewitness reports are often ridiculously inaccurate, contradictory, and often worthless.

One common experiment is showing a short film with a car accident in a psych class and then quizzing the class afterward about the accident...even the most basic details are routinely botched, things that didn't occur are invented, etc. by completely sane and intelligent people.

The ONLY way eyewitness testimony is useful is through very careful, standardized interviews of a lot of people and then comparing the data.

BTW..as an aside..where the heck are people getting the idea that the Concorde crash is some sort of inexplicable mystery?

314 posted on 11/12/2001 6:24:20 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
"I'm not a tin foil hat type, but considering it's Veteran's Day, that's pretty coincidental evidence that it could be terrorists."

I'm not the tinfoil hat type either, but since new procedures and sky marshalls are making it harder for hijackers, what are the odds of sabotage? It is Veteran's day.

315 posted on 11/12/2001 6:24:25 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Planes were being diverted, and Delta Air Lines spokeswoman Peggy Estes said the airline was working to account for all its planes.
316 posted on 11/12/2001 6:24:28 AM PST by tort_feasor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

IMHO I don't think this was a midair: 1) The nearest arrival path is where the Maspeth gas tanks used to be (arrival into LGA); 2) No aircraft are allowed within 18 nm of JFK unless they are departing or arriving; no transient ops.

The location of the crash looks to me as though they were running departures off runway 31L (the one closest to the beach). That is their preferred runway.

The departure procedure off that side is called the "BREEZY POINT CLIMB" and it requires an immediate sharp left climbing turn for noise abatement (in the general direction of CARNARSIE if I remember correctly). I have seen many commercial pilots start that climb within 500 ft of the ground. If something went wrong during this procedure, I could easily understand how the crew might lose control of the aircraft.

317 posted on 11/12/2001 6:24:36 AM PST by IFly4Him
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
The chances of it being terrorist driven are slim.

You tell everyone to chill out and wait until moe facts are in, and then you make the giant leap to no terroist involvement, with no evidence to support it. Sheesh!

318 posted on 11/12/2001 6:25:05 AM PST by yikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
"Can dogs detect a smell of C-4?"

Yes, but I do not know if it can be effectively masked from scent.....

NeverGore

319 posted on 11/12/2001 6:25:05 AM PST by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: michigander

Looks like two separate smoke plumes -- consistent with two sites, as Rudy said. I don't know how much smoke and flame an engine could cause -- could a lone engine cause that much smoke?

320 posted on 11/12/2001 6:25:26 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 961-966 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson