Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can We Do Without Saudi Oil?
The Weekly Standard ^ | 11/19/2001 | Irwin M. Stelzer

Posted on 11/10/2001 4:44:11 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-226 next last
To: Carry_Okie
What do we do about the radioactive isotopes people breathe RIGHT NOW from combusted coal?

First of all how is that distinguished from all other combusted fuels?

81 posted on 11/10/2001 8:46:01 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Second of all....please stop using the term "fella"...(not all posters are men) or I will be forced to use the term "girlfriend" when replying to you.
82 posted on 11/10/2001 8:47:47 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Actually,one of the simpler things to do in this situation is to run cars on something else,hydrogen or alcohol.And invest billions for Russian and Mexican pipelines.We don't need the Saudi's THAT much.Eventually we have to find solutions to this problem anyway,because the oil is going to run out all together.
83 posted on 11/10/2001 8:53:38 PM PST by alithia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Most of which require more energy than they produce, especially photovoltaics.

Most of which? Alright then lets look at those which produce more energy than they produce. Let's begin with Aluminum Fuel Cells. Unless you have something else you'd rather we look into.

84 posted on 11/10/2001 8:54:10 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
ugly but a great idea!!!!!
85 posted on 11/10/2001 8:58:33 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JDGreen123
Ok, so here’s what we do. We, Russia, England, and Pakistan control Afghanistan and make it an “international” cosmopolitan country that has respect for the various reasonable customs of the various different ethnic groups. We turn the different regions into international tourist areas, with Disney and other companies building huge resort hotels. The US, England, and Russia join forces to build the pipeline. The mountain areas to the north are opened to development of super ski resorts. We’ll use Tourist Guy as the spokesman for the new emerging vacation spot of Southwest Asia. This will also help open up the “Stans” for American development and markets for our cars, trucks, and other consumer products. We’ll allow companies to rent dune buggies to tourists for some outstanding cross country off-road trips.
86 posted on 11/10/2001 9:05:36 PM PST by Fred25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
We've also got troops stationed in Saudi Arabia. 15 of the 19 terrorists on 9-11 were Saudis.
87 posted on 11/10/2001 9:14:19 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RadicalRik; Pokey78
..... Let the Saudis, Kuwaitis, UAE, Iraq and Iran keep their oil .....

Until, some time in the not too distant future when the supply of "friendly oil" is running out and the price of "cheap oil" is $300.00 per barrel and then -- when we are most seriously disadvantaged by those facts -- and they are most empowered by them -- we will go to them for the oil by whose use we maintain Our FRaternal Republic and grease the wheels of Human Civilization!

Or we continue to piss in their pockets now and squeeze every last drop of their "unfriendly oil" out of their stinking shitholes while it is "cheap" -- and save ours -- and all of the world's other "friendly oil" until the $300.00 per barrel accrues only to us -- and to our friends?

88 posted on 11/10/2001 9:40:31 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The question is really academic and passé, because we have to win this conflict decisively -- bringing about a major realignment and Westernization of the Middle East -- for far more important reasons than oil. That the oil keeps coming will simply be an added bonus.
89 posted on 11/10/2001 9:47:44 PM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: d4now; snopercod
I was watching experiments in aluminum-air technology in the late '70s (I'm fuzzy on the date). LLL had a running car and took it to LA, requiring only added water. I was impressed at the time, until I learned more. (See? And you thought I hadn't thought about it...)

It takes large amounts of electricity to refine aluminum. The energy for the necessary, highly-purified water doesn't come cheap either. That's why it costs $900 per kilowatt, even for a stationary system (the current goal is $800). Oh, and go get that copper mine and how about the rare-earths for the magnets? (Then there's the $50,000 baseline for a car. I guess you just don't care that much about the little people, they can ride mass transit into their sustainable development hell-holes.) I don't think you are going to get a lot of takers unless gasoline is far more expensive and the system far more developed (which is of course what the people who are pushing both simultaneously want). The alum-air portable power packs currently in development are perhaps a good application.

I think you'll see cars and rural stationary electric generation running off propane fuel cells first, and that is with platinum catylists. Propane has higher energy density and is much safer to transport and store. It has existing distribution. Ballard has a long head start and a lot of backing from the same pack of crooks. BTW, where are you going to mine all that bauxite, copper, and rare-earth minerals? Russia? China? Where? Our mines have been shut down by those self-same RICOnuts, unless the owners are Europeans.

IMO, the ONLY reason you will see such technologies is that the crooks in charge of manipulating the body politic make more money on them. They could never compete with nuclear on cost unless the lawyers they have in their pay were making it uneconomic. To justify those alternatives they had to make electrical power a LOT more expensive because the industry kept finding all that nasty oil and prices were too low for their taste. Hence the California Power Crisis, and yes, it was the same batch of clowns that made it happen. As a result, $900/KW is starting to look like something less than a complete boondoggle. Have you ever wondered why John Bryson was running SCE?

90 posted on 11/10/2001 9:51:16 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: Carry_Okie
It takes large amounts of electricity to refine aluminum.

And what about recycled aluminum? Given the present percentage of recycled aluminum verses newly refined aluminum in use today (and their respective costs of producion)? And the over all costs of of either concerning our present conversation.

92 posted on 11/10/2001 10:16:29 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: All
yes we can do without saudi oil, its called RUSSIAN CRUDE AND NATURAL GAS!!!

we need to become closer friends with russia and forget the BS talk from the war party. we need to rely more on russian oil than arab oil!!!

93 posted on 11/10/2001 10:17:21 PM PST by oxi-nato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ratcat
and a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan.

Would that be a fully functioning pipeline?

94 posted on 11/10/2001 10:18:49 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Can we do without mayonaise, or hamburger buns, or soda pop, too. I don't think so!!
95 posted on 11/10/2001 10:27:47 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
This kind of thing drives me nuts- we have the energy we need, in coal, oil, gas, and nuclear- what we further need is the will to go get it and develop it. France determined during the 1973 oil embargo "never again!" and now about 75% of their electric power come from atomic energy- we could have already done the same! There's no excuse for us importing so much oil when we have in in the ground and offshore.
97 posted on 11/11/2001 2:17:27 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
If this were truly a war, the gasoline rationing coupons would have already been sent out, and the importing of petroleum from Saudi Arabia would have been forbidden.

But this is another armchair war...

98 posted on 11/11/2001 3:21:39 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: l33t
What I don't understand is why no serious effort has been undertaken to develop the technology to control the nuclear fusion reaction for use in power generation.

Because it will take a government investment of $1 trillion and the oil interests won't let that happen.


BUMP

99 posted on 11/11/2001 4:22:11 AM PST by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; Carry_Okie; Pissed Off Janitor
Foster Wheeler Awarded Contract for Escravos Gas-to-Liquids Project

HAMILTON, Bermuda--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 5, 2001--Foster Wheeler Ltd. (NYSE: FWC) announced that its subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Nigeria have been awarded a $20 million, front-end engineering and design (FEED) contract, by Chevron Nigeria Ltd (CNL) for a gas-to-liquids (GTL) project.

Chevron Nigeria Ltd is a joint venture of Chevron and the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation.

Foster Wheeler will be responsible for the FEED and the preparation of the invitation to tender for the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract. The scope of work also includes the issue of inquiry for long-lead equipment items, preparation of project estimates and assistance for early works activities.

The GTL plant is a major natural gas initiative by project asset owners CNL and will be built in Escravos, Nigeria. It provides significant environmental benefits by eliminating the flaring of natural gas and instead converting it to produce ultraclean GTL fuel.

The plant will produce 34,000 bpd of premium quality GTL fuel (synthetic fuel suitable for diesel engines) and naphtha products.

The plant is the first of its kind to utilize the Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate process, a new technology for a gas-to-liquids plant. The technology optimally integrates three state-of-the-art GTL technologies from Haldor Topsoe, Sasol and Chevron to produce GTL fuel and chemical naphtha for export. This process is a commercially proven proprietary Sasol technology for converting natural gas into liquid hydrocarbon in three steps.

Ian Bill, chairman and chief executive, Foster Wheeler Energy Limited, said, "This project will use the leading application of GTL technology. It has global significance because the eradication of gas flaring will produce significant benefits for the environment and local community."

Foster Wheeler Awarded Contract for Gas-To-Liquids Project in Qatar

Economic study by FWC

SYNTROLEUM, ADVANTAGE AND ENAP TO PURSUE GAS-TO-LIQUIDS PROJECT IN CHILE

...Santiago, Chili ¾ Syntroleum Corporation (Nasdaq: SYNM) announced today that it has signed an agreement with Empresa Nacionál del Petroleo (ENAP), the national oil company of Chile, and Advantage Resources International, headquartered in Denver, Colorado to conduct a project assessment study for a 10,000 barrel per day synthetic fuels plant to be located at the ENAP-owned Cabo Negro Industrial Park near Punta Arenas, Chile. The proposed project would utilize currently available natural gas delivered by pipeline from fields in Argentina and Chile..... Deal to put one in Alaska

100 posted on 11/11/2001 4:44:58 AM PST by Hamiltonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson