Posted on 11/10/2001 5:39:55 AM PST by shuckmaster
Lakeside High School officials are asking students not to wear clothing bearing the Confederate flag, at least for now.
While the Columbia County school system does not prohibit students from wearing the Confederate standard, recent racial tensions at Lakeside have prompted school officials to temporarily ban it on campus.
"On Tuesday we had five students involved in what we call actions preceding a fight; they were yelling at each other and squaring off," Lakeside Principal Victor Lee said. "Three of them were black, and two were white. The black kids came out with the fact that they felt like we were a racist school, with the kids wearing the Confederate flag, and they made an issue out of it."
The five students were suspended, Mr. Lee said. Nine other white students were identified throughout the day trying to promote the fight off-campus.
"As we got involved with those nine, I noticed that some of them were wearing the Confederate flag, and I asked them to work with me as we got through this issue and not wear the Confederate flag for a while," he said.
The students who were wearing the Confederate flag were asked to change their attire, said schools Superintendent Tommy Price.
"It is my understanding that they had other T-shirts to take their place and that they didn't have a problem with it," he said.
Students are generally not prohibited from wearing the flag at school.
"As long as there's no real problem caused by it, we don't have a problem with students wearing the Confederate emblem," Mr. Price said. "But given the disruption it's causing in the school, we felt like we needed to take this stance at this time."
It doesn't matter what they did. What matters is what I give to my children to pass on to their children.
Are you able to distinguish between culture and politics?
I like that one - - I think it's hilarious, if you are referring to the cartoon sun with the smiling face and the sunglasses.
The answer is...... 19.
Confederate Battle Flag faces new skirmish
Confederate flag destroyed: Student says vandalism wont deter him and considers it a hate crime.
Rebelling against Confederate costumes
NAACP continues boycott against SC tourism
Where was patriotism when we needed it?
Confederate flag battle still in court
How the Civil War Could Have Been Avoided
After attacks, many Southerners fly different flag
Four more students suspended for wearing Confederate flags
New Theory Offered in Hunley Sinking
Driving Dixie Down
15 students suspended over Confederate flag T-shirts
What would Abraham Lincoln do?
Confederate Decline
Bessinger Vows New Fight For Confederate Flag
County changes flags to show unity
Confederate flag, teacher absent from open house
Some Southern Charm Is Wearing Off: It's the Unique Way It Sounds
The Confederate Solution to World Terrorism:
Confederate Flag Raises Flap in School
Flag Banned In Cleveland School
Old Glory flies again at Piggy Park restaurants
Bridge controversy resurfaces NAACP to file complaint for 'Confederate' name change
Stanly to close offices for Confederate Memorial Day
new Hunley article
Black Mayoral Candidate Embraces Confederate Flag
Most Northerners believe that all slaves were mistreated in the South. Propoganda & revisionist history. Why would the ex-slaves refuse to flee up north, and serve instead with their former owners? Why, when given the choice to leave, would the majority choose to sharecrop beside their former owner?
I'll admit it. I have ancestors that owned slaves. BTW, also know of more than a few blacks that owned slaves as well, especially in Charleston circa 1860, but that's neither here nor there.
Tell me, how many free blacks lived say in Illinois around that same time? or maybe Oregon?
Oh, that's right. Free blacks weren't even ALLOWED in those states. Have you found anything yet before late 1862(and I use that date because by then he had lost most support from northern voters and HAD to ask for abolitionist help) stating lincoln's total disgust with his home state's law instituted in 1853? Or Oregon's state constitution in 1859? Or the Connecticut laws? And you wonder why blacks, free or slave, were prevalent in the South? By many NORTHERN state laws, they weren't even allowed to live in the north!!
Right On!! You reckon Illway will read them?
How DARE Trinity Marine Lakeside) be so "politically correct" and high handed and cowardly as to ban (hard-hats from wearing) the American Flag at ANY time, particularly at time of WAR!
This is DISGUSTING and almost treasonous!
SHAME on Trinity Marine (Lakeside)!
P.S. Mao Tse Tung coined the term "political correctness" which is a chillingly UN-American concept, which tramples on the Constitution and the First Amendment!
Ergo, you are Maoists, NOT Americans!
In Illinois there were 7628 free Blacks of all ages in 1860. In Oregon there were 128. By comparison there were 144 free Blacks living in Arkansas, a state with about 6 times as many people as Oregon. There were 8627 free Blacks in Connecticut. In Texas, which had about the the same population as Connecticut, there were 355. Looking at it another way, 99.88% of all Blacks in Arkansas and 99.81% of all Blacks in Texas were slaves while 100.00% of the free Blacks in Oregon and Illinois were not. Statistics are SO much fun. Any other questions?
I grew up in a large family, 8 kids. My dad worked and my mom didn't drive so while we had a car, it was registered and licensed in my father's name and he was the sole driver. So one way of looking at it is that only 10% of the people in my family owned a car. But we all reaped the benefits of car ownership. Likewise with slavery. The total number of slave owners may have been around 6 or 7 percent, depending on the state, but undoubtably almost all of those slave-owners had wives and children. Looking at it that way, almost 50% of the families in Mississippi owned slaves. Over 40% of the families in South Carolina and Georgia. Over all, almost 30% of the families in the south owned slaves. So that is why it was so important to them. They weren't fighting to defend the rights of 6% of the population, they were fighting to defend an institution that almost a third of them had directly benefited from.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.