[BibChr]

Oh, come now: reulsing, from the Latin ulsare, meaning... well... "to ulse." Thus, "to ulse again." (What do they teach these days?)

Dan

PS -- seriously, insert a "p" between e and u, and you'll have it.

[Elihu Burritt]

You had me going for a second with reulsing. I wasn't sure if it was revulsing or repulsing, which is essentially the difference between push and pull. I thing the V word more appropriate for Keyes, as he is more inclined to put out what people don't want to hear, whereas W repulses me with his tendency to put out what people do want to hear.

Keyes is not without his faults too, but W bears the responsibilities of his inactions more strongly as he holds the reins in his hands. His response to tampering with fetus' is largely meaningless as it only takes that work into the realm of free trade. Talk with no walk. This would happen anyways, but a real stance would be an unqualified and clear position against it as opposed to a fudge mark.

Politicians spend their lives telling us one thing and then doing another, yet so few it seems are willing to say "I tell my daughter that abortions are not acceptable." Perhaps many of them look at Keyes and find only a fear in their hearts as to what might happen to them if they did was Keyes does.