Sorry Dead, but unless she's acting under of color of law (which she obviously is not), the First Amendment has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with her despicable conduct or the frivilous lawsuit that she has threatened to commence. I get it, because I know it.
Sorry Dead, but unless she's acting under of color of law (which she obviously is not), the First Amendment has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with her despicable conduct or the frivilous lawsuit that she has threatened to commence.
She threatened to petition the courts (which are the government) to restrict his rights. The fact that she wouldn’t have been able to, and obviously doesn’t know the law, is irrelevant. We were attacking her for her cavalier and ignorant desire to deny others their constitutionally protected freedoms.
I get it, because I know it.
You don’t get it. You said that she was only trying to restrict posts to her own website (Hillary.com has the right to control speech on its web site.) You were completely and inarguably wrong in that point (“Please delete that picture from your server or you leave me no option but to sue you.”)
And, oblivious to the gaping flaws in your own argument, you chastised everybody for not seeing the issue the way you saw it. You were wrong and you showed poor form to boot.