What more do you want me to clarify? I already told you that my comment may have been misleading and so I pressed my point on Pakistani governement instead of Pakistan.
But looks like you want to settle some score here. Alright here you go...Prove it to the free republic that all this mess wouldn't have happened if Pakistani Government have not funded and supported Taleban and other extremists who in turn are threatening the freedom not only in America but in the entire world.
And then you refused to address my second question - if a single anthrax-laced letter mailed in Pakistan implicates the Pakistani government in state-sponsored terrorism, then shouldn't the anthrax-laced letters mailed in the United States implicate the U.S. government in the same?
But looks like you want to settle some score here. Alright here you go...Prove it to the free republic that all this mess wouldn't have happened if Pakistani Government have not funded and supported Taleban and other extremists who in turn are threatening the freedom not only in America but in the entire world.
Trying to change the subject, eh? That's another time-honored propaganda technique, especially when you couple it as you have here with a demand that I prove a negative. You may think you're being slick here, but we've seen oodles of propaganda of varying quality over the years, and your stuff is definitely minor-league.