[gumbo]

So you consider it OK to make a flawed allegation and then refuse to defend it?

I think pumacan clarified his "flawed allegation" by saying he thought the government of Pakistan could indeed have some involvement.

Like I said, that's not so far-fetched! What about Abdul Haq? What about the fact that Musharraf - whom we all like - took over in a coup and has probably not rooted out all radical elements?

[dirtboy]

I think pumacan clarified his "flawed allegation" by saying he thought the government of Pakistan could indeed have some involvement. Like I said, that's not so far-fetched!

It proves NOTHING - once again, if you pursue your "logic" here, does the fact that many more anthrax-laced letters were mailed in the United States implicate our government? Of course not. So this particular incident proves nothing - especially since Post 63 states that there was no anthrax in the letter in question.