[gumbo]

General Musharraf has a difficult challenge in keeping his population under control. So far he has done a commendable job and the steps he has taken so far in support of the United States deserve praise, not this kind of propaganda smear.

I haven't seen any "smear" against General Musharraf. Where do you see this?

I do not think it is at all fetched, or even wicked as you imply, for us to question some elements of the government in Pakistan. What do you have to say regarding the alleged betrayal of Abdul Haq by operatives within the Pakistani government?

[gumbo]

Make that, "I do not think it is at all far-fetched..."

[dirtboy]

Hey, gumbo, pumacan just cut and ran with this lame response without defending his assertions:

We are not here to prove anything neither are we suppose to. We are here to expess our views.

I rest my case. And he tried to pin this attack on the Pakistani government, so my position becomes even clearer. You can defend him if you want, but you're wasting time...

[Dog Gone]

I have no problem at all with questions raised about elements within the Pakistani government and their possible allegiance.

I do have a problem with the suggestion that if someone in Pakistan mailed an anthrax letter we should treat the entire country and government as being responsible. There is not a shred of evidence that anyone in the Pakistani government was responsible for this, much less that it was an official government-sanctioned act of terrorism.

[dirtboy]

I haven't seen any "smear" against General Musharraf. Where do you see this?

Post 44 by Pumacan:

However I do agree with you that it's kinda misleading in one way. I should have said Pakistan government rather than Pakistan.

So pumacan is trying to connect this event to the government of Pakistan. Propaganda smear.