Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pumacan
Then say that clearly, instead of insinuating that there is some kind of state-sponsorship to the anthrax attack - because by that logic, since most of the anthrax letters were mailed in the United States, the United States must therefore be sheltering the terrorists. Do you see how absurd that "logic" really is?

Looks like you got it all wrong.
Let me clarify. Pakistan is under military coup. It is not represented by peoples mandate. So now when we refer to Pakistan it doesn't mean that we are referring to all the peoples of Pakistan.

However I do agree with you that it's kinda misleading in one way. I should have said Pakistan government rather than Pakistan.

44 posted on 11/07/2001 6:59:27 AM PST by pumacan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: pumacan
I should have said Pakistan government rather than Pakistan.

Ya just proved my point. Once again, tell me how a single letter mailed in Pakistan implicates the government of Pakistan of state-sponsorship of bioterrorism. After all, we've had several letters mailed from the United States, so is the U.S. a major sponsor of terrorism upon itself? Usually, absurd logic is the tool of the propagandist.

46 posted on 11/07/2001 7:01:39 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson