Posted on 11/06/2001 9:00:49 PM PST by Mighty Mouse
Edited on 05/07/2004 5:20:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
I have watched this thread and the related ones for days.
Your antagonists here will NEVER be convinced by anything as simple as logic.
In order to win you would have to "get it". Apparantly, in order to "get it", you must NEVER accept that one of their heroes could easily have been confused with one of the folks you find wandering the streets of most big cities, spouting the alien invasion/government is my enemy/the CIA is behind all problems ect.
Yet, with a radio he is suddenly a leader and hero.
Didnt think he needed a licence to drive? One of the primary reasons for drivers licences is to regulate who can drive, if for no other reason than public safety. In the world of no licences, children, the infirm, mentaly retarded and any other person could simply get behind the wheel and go.
If this is the world you desire and the leaders you follow, count me out.
But I dont "get it" either.
They couldn't win the case I filed so they changed the case, attributed statements to me in the ruling that I didn't make and lied in the rulings where ever it was necessary to support the ruling they were going to make. They originally charged me with falsifying my taxes and 6 months later, after all the damage was done, (lost my job) they said I was right all along.
That's just the tip of the iceberg.
They tapped my phone. Had my house buzzed with a military helicopter (caught on tape). Subpoenaed all my lawyers records. Bugged my lawyers office. And put my computer under real time surveilance. Want to hear more?
And would you believe this, they justlogged me off my own computer, just as I was going to post this message.
Hey cut it out already!
Oh and did I mention that they backdated and or intercepted mail with regards to the case and opened mail addressed to me from the U. S. Attorney. Only on America!
Allusions seemed to be made that advanced electronic warfare and studies in mental phenomenon had led to a state of art wherein dreams could be induced, voices planted in one's thoughts, other ideas or emotions induced, etc.
Seems like Cooper advanced the notion that the alien abduction reports were actually real military encounters with the encounter cloaked by a false image being imparted on the unwitting observer or passer-by. Sort of a tangent to the Men-in-Black flashing ball point pen resetting a person's memory only with reidentifying any person during the encounter as an alien form.
My impression of his death is analagous to a visitor in Crete witnessing a conflict between a Turk and a Greek patriot. One might not know who started what, and understand arguments defending both points of view rigorously, but at least one could glean a very real conflict existed.
I have no idea what a wiccan hit squad is, or what it has to do with this thread.
Slainte,
CC
A technicality only cared about by statists. It is not an indication of ones moral stature. A fraudulent law demands to be disobeyed.
An anarchist may be a moral person, without question. That has nothing to do with whether an enforceable law has been broken, although the statists who object to the criminal's conduct might consider it in determining the extent of the punishment.
I live in Miami so I've seen an upsurge of crimes against citizenry by corrupt government officials and the policemen who support them. When you have 80 year old grandmothers chained to traffic posts for three hours, Janet Ray Weininger, daughter of an American hero thrown against a glass window and breaking her nose, as she's walking out of a restaurant with a decorated Vietnam vet, who the policemen tells he did it because someone threw a bottle at him three blocks away and he was mad, and other atrocious behavior over the years, you get jaded by it all. Shalom, PD
But if they knew that he was 'over' why didn't they pop him with a T-dart, and take him to the nut house rather than head into a predictible gun fight?
At best it's some really bad police work, and more likely a leagalized snuffing.
I realize that some people are too paranoid to be carrying guns; some of my neighbors staged the re-make of the O-K corral out on a forrest service road near Twain Harte. - Now one is in the hospital, and the other is in jail, and all of it over their over-active, paranoid imaginations.
Monetary damages were "against policy." I got a piece of paper saying they wouldn't do to me again, what they had already done to me on a systematic basis over an extended period of time (try about 6 years). Heck of a deterrent don't you think? No, they just got more sophisticated about it.
Anyway, I appealed the decision of the regional authority to the General Counsel in Washington (what timing). After a year and a half waiting for the big creep sugar bubba to appoint a general counsel to rule on the appeal, lo and behold the SOB appointed the same counsel that had made the original unlawful decision in the first place, to the General Counsel position in Washington. Well, what do you think the General Counsel's decision from Washington was? The same decision. So much for independent review. The guy reviewed his own decision.
It wouldn't have been so bad, except that most of my situation was brought about because I was known to be, god forbid, an evil REPUBLICAN!
Well I bought a tape recorder to record my phone conversations with these UNELECTED officials (turnabout is fair play) and guess what? The tape recorder is lying. "My memory fails me." "I only remember what I want to remember." A house cleaning is in order IMHO. Never happen!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.