Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rudder
"the reader is supposed to conclude that since we supported that which we now fight, we should desist in shame."

Some articles aim at that, I know. That's one reason I compiled this from quotes from a Main Player that is still influential, just like Kissinger is.

My main interest was the fact that we've decided that we can't fail to "win" in this. It's a Game to World Politicians that they don't lose chunks of their bodies in.

The comments about Russia/Soviets becoming demoralized and effectively bankrupted as a goal that was achieved should been flashing Red to us. We've had OUR VietNam, do we want another? Only worse.

10 posted on 11/06/2001 8:44:00 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: rdavis84
We've had OUR VietNam, do we want another? Only worse.

Geez, I hate it when it comes to this. But it has.

You pique an anxiety that all of us share, especially those who remember and those who were there in Nam: Concerns about another Viet Nam and the quagmire of it all.

Nam was different, because of many factors.

Now we have been breached. Now we are the defenders.

Then we reached, almost as if to find a war or to fill a vacuum. "To keep the Cong from San Francisco," was actually a rallying cry from the Pentagon.

We weren't sure as a nation why we were in Nam.

We have no such doubt about our motives now.

Could this, still, become a quaigmire?

Of course it could.

Toughen up.

12 posted on 11/06/2001 9:29:52 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson