Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tacis
A total loser issue for the Republicans to be on the wrong side of. IT gives the security issue to the Dems. How can Republicans paint Dems as soft on terrorism when they won't even pass a bill to protect airline passengers?

The best hope that comes out of this mess is that we wind up with these private security firms being subsidized by the Gov't to provide higher pay and benifits. This would be the worst outcome, as the same people would still be employed, just getting paid more!

I've been through customs many times, and if the security were set up as it is, it would be much better than it is currently. Bush should have never buckled to DeLay's stupid arguments. Instead, he could have argued for having a tough set of standards for firing employees.

Anyway, I think this will wind up coming back to haunt DeLay. No way will the Dems compromise, why should they? THey've got a 100-0 Senate vote to campaign on against moderate House Republicans that voted against this!

9 posted on 11/06/2001 8:13:31 AM PST by Vis Numar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Vis Numar
That 100-0 vote was to get the bill quickly to the House. The Republican senators, except for McLame, are NOT for federalizing more employees.
20 posted on 11/06/2001 8:54:00 AM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson