Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheOtherOne
The one and only area where Federal workers makes sense is in the security arena.

The problem with making feds out of security screeners is just that: to satisfy the PC watchdawgs, we will simpy have to hire all those poor screeners who will lose their jobs. So, we wind up with better-paid versions of what we have now.

IMHO, aiport security is a job for the military. Those folks are accountable for their performance. They're specialists -- and, by the way, highly underpaid.

29 posted on 11/05/2001 9:16:58 AM PST by RightRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: RightRules
IMHO, aiport security is a job for the military. Those folks are accountable for their performance. They're specialists -- and, by the way, highly underpaid.

I agree 100%. When I say 'Federalize' the workers, I mean militarize the airport security, as though it were a US border (Hmm, crazy thought). I do not mean simply hire the same un-trained airport crossing guards back as Federal security officers.

34 posted on 11/05/2001 9:25:25 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: RightRules
The problem with making feds out of security screeners is just that: to satisfy the PC watchdawgs, we will simpy have to hire all those poor screeners who will lose their jobs. So, we wind up with better-paid versions of what we have now.

You are right on the money with that one.

67 posted on 11/05/2001 11:04:53 AM PST by ginger's dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson