To: OKCSubmariner
You're right. Motive is circumstantial justification for suspicion. It's more useful in building a case for an arrest warrant than in building a case for conviction where other evidence exists. Motive is very helpful to a prosecutor trying to get a conviction on circumstantial evidence alone, but it isn't at all crucial in a case which includes physical evidence and sworn testimony.
75 posted on
11/03/2001 3:46:15 PM PST by
Twodees
To: Twodees
Motive is very helpful to a prosecutor trying to get a conviction on circumstantial evidence alone, but it isn't at all crucial in a case which includes physical evidence and sworn testimony.Bullsh!t!. This is how you people deny reality. I am officially gone from this thread. Good night.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson