Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
An embargo is a total refusal to trade and is generally imposed on an individual country in the form of sanctions. It usually has to be imposed by a coalition of countries as was the case in South Africa. A protective tariff on oil from outside of Nafta would be more feasible and could be imposed by an act of Congress. The arabs might object to the WTO as Canada is doing in the case of softwood lumber tariffs. The irony of this is that Canada is an ally which we are supposed to have free trade with and lumber imports are hardly a threat to security; while arab oil dependency does compromise security, yet Bush has just imposed a 30% tariff on Canadian lumber. Why not impose a 30% tariff on Arab oil? I would also expand Nafta to include Britain and Ireland.
25 posted on 11/03/2001 12:55:33 AM PST by ganesha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ganesha
NAFTA was created to compete with the EU. I don't think the Brits would join NAFTA unless the liberals in Britain decide to keep the pound and screw the EU.
30 posted on 11/03/2001 1:03:13 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson