Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JWinNC
I have a MAK 90 in 7.62 X 39mm and another one in .223. Does anyone have an opinion or experience on the .223? I understand the MAK 90 is the same thing as the AK 47 except with different furniture. Any comments on this?
187 posted on 11/04/2001 5:21:51 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Don Myers
I have a MAK 90 in 7.62 X 39mm and another one in .223. Does anyone have an opinion or experience on the .223? I understand the MAK 90 is the same thing as the AK 47 except with different furniture. Any comments on this?

Yep, the MAK-90 was the original "revised" AK, sans flash hider and bayonet lug, with the thumbhole stock replacing the evil pistol-grip design. Aside from the application of Political Correctness, it's basically a Norinco stamped-receiver AK-47S (Semi-Auto). I believe that if you replace a certain number of parts with ones made in the U.S., you can return it to the pistol-grip stock. Check with the message boards at AK-47.net.

As for the .223 version, I've heard generally good things about them. Many people like the super-rugged AK design, paired with the NATO cartridge. I've had my eye on one of the Romanian SAR-3 rifles, which is a .223 AK. Rough-looking, but inexpensive!

189 posted on 11/04/2001 10:29:16 PM PST by Cloud William
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson