[TrueBeliever9]

OH! So when the kid, whose name escapes, tell Harry that what he is doing is wrong and he stands up against Harry for right against wrong; then, a spell is put on him where he can't move and falls on his face like a board for standing up against wrong does not apply!

[Always Right]

OH! So when the kid, whose name escapes, tell Harry that what he is doing is wrong and he stands up against Harry for right against wrong; then, a spell is put on him where he can't move and falls on his face like a board for standing up against wrong does not apply!

Well, if I remember correctly, Harry and Co. were in a rush to save the universe from evil. So the kid was trying to stand up for rules and did not have a clue what harry was up to, so I wouldn't exactly classify that right against wrong. In fact, Harry had the greater good on his side.

[null and void]

Neville. If Harry and his friends had listened to Neville he-who-must-not-be-named would have been restored to full power. Do you listen to people who say bombing the Taleban is wrong because it kills people?

[Ward Smythe]

If your "question" was in English, I could perhaps follow it a little better. As it is, I'm drawing a blank on the specific reference.

Nonetheless, the point is that there ARE consequences to one's actions. Bad actions = bad consequences. When Harry does things he shouldn't, there are always consequences.