Skip to comments.
Physicists Advance Theory For New Class Of Quantum Phase Transition
ScienceDaily ^
| 10.29.01
| Rice University
Posted on 10/29/2001 5:14:00 AM PST by callisto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
10/29/2001 5:14:00 AM PST
by
callisto
To: RightWhale; Physicist; MarkWar; Howlin; blam
ping
2
posted on
10/29/2001 5:15:25 AM PST
by
callisto
To: callisto
There is a growing realization that the apparent breakdown of the standard theory of metals Landaus Fermi-liquid theory in high-temperature superconductors and related systems may result from proximity to quantum criticality. Well du-uh.
3
posted on
10/29/2001 5:24:49 AM PST
by
Maceman
To: callisto
Modern Physics is exploding with new understanding. The entire spectrum of Quantum Mechanics is surging with breakthrough science. The near future holds possible what until recently was thought to be impossible.
Mike
4
posted on
10/29/2001 5:25:39 AM PST
by
MichaelP
To: callisto; *RealScience
bump to: list
Click here for a list of all RealScience articles
5
posted on
10/29/2001 5:36:08 AM PST
by
willyb_jr
To: callisto; newzjunkey
bump for later reading.
To: MichaelP
Science and technology are growing at an exponential rate. The amount of newly discovered information that is written daily is overwhelming to keep up with. Now we just need computers with the ability to process all of this data....But one is on the way to link a lot of the worlds universities that computes in petabytes...approximately 1 million gigabytes!!!! WOW!!!
7
posted on
10/29/2001 5:38:40 AM PST
by
callisto
To: callisto
"...that computes in petabytes..." What next, namblabytes?
8
posted on
10/29/2001 5:43:53 AM PST
by
Vide
To: callisto
Any chance of getting a new weapon out of this research? (Sorry, one track mind these days.)
9
posted on
10/29/2001 5:55:11 AM PST
by
samtheman
To: samtheman
Does a bear have hair?
10
posted on
10/29/2001 6:00:41 AM PST
by
Check6
To: samtheman
Any chance of getting a new weapon out of this research?
I see
lots of possiblities here for new weapons.
11
posted on
10/29/2001 6:00:53 AM PST
by
callisto
To: samtheman
The Chicoms are probably looking at it as we speak (if they didn't have the research in their hands months ago).
12
posted on
10/29/2001 6:01:53 AM PST
by
Check6
To: Vide
What next, namblabytes?
ROTFLMAO!!!! You must be wide awake this AM!
13
posted on
10/29/2001 6:02:13 AM PST
by
callisto
To: samtheman
I wonder if Qimiao Si would quality for a Secret or Top Secret clearance . . . bet not.
14
posted on
10/29/2001 6:04:05 AM PST
by
Check6
To: callisto
bump for later
15
posted on
10/29/2001 6:05:19 AM PST
by
d4now
To: Gordian Blade
ping
So where are my room-temperature superconductors and maglev trains and railguns and what-have-you? This is good money we're spending here, and if we can't have newer and better ways to frag bad guys, I don't wanna bother ;)
To: general_re
I'm leaving soon for my class, but I want to take a closer look when I get a chance.
One of my classmates in grad school did his Ph.D. thesis on maglev. It can work technically, but the cost per mile of the track is very high compared with conventional high-speed track. Too bad.
Then I have another friend who worked on railguns. They couldn't make a practical weapon out of it. Too bad.
Then I have another friend from grad school who was working on magnetic containment for controlled fusion. That hasn't worked yet, although some progress is being made. Too bad.
Is there a pattern here?
To: Vide
After petabytes, come exobytes.
18
posted on
10/29/2001 6:42:31 AM PST
by
zeugma
To: callisto
I'd be interested in seeing some charts of data relating to these newly discovered phase transitions. I recall reading many years ago that electromagnetic state transitions are governed by the Mandelebrot formula.
19
posted on
10/29/2001 6:49:51 AM PST
by
zeugma
To: Gordian Blade
Is there a pattern here?
Yes. Hanging around with you is bad luck. Stop making so many friends - it's retarding the progress of science ;)
More seriously, it seems pretty clear that a lot of these things have been somewhat oversold in the public imagination. If I were a cynic, I might say that this is the inevitable result of the vagaries of scientific funding - turning scientists into salesmen, and funding the best salesmen rather than the most promising scientists.
But, less cynically, when you say magnetic containment fields for fusion, are you speaking of tokamak-type reactors? I seem to recall some articles a few years ago showing some progress down around Princeton way....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson