Posted on 10/27/2001 12:17:07 PM PDT by Soul Citizen
Saturday Oct. 27, 2001; 2:31 p.m. EDT
Clintonized FBI Fingers 'Right-Wing Hate Groups' in Anthrax Probe
In a move reminiscent of the botched FBI investigations of the Clinton era, the bureau is actively pursuing weak leads suggesting "right-wing hate groups" are involved in the recent wave of anthrax attacks on the U.S.
Meanwhile clear circumstantial evidence pointing to Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden appears to have been placed on the back burner.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 the U.S. hadn't suffered a single case of inhalation anthrax since 1976.
Still probers continue to insist they see no connection between the events of that day and the anthrax-laden letters sent out the next week to every branch of the U.S. government, the CIA, the big three network news divisions and the headquarters prominent newspapers from New York to Florida.
"Everything seems to lean toward a domestic source," one senior FBI official told the Washington Post Saturday. "Nothing seems to fit with an overseas terrorist type operation."
For some victims, such a claim seems more than a little absurd.
Steve Coz, for instance, whose National Enquirer headquarters in Florida was the first to be hit with an anthrax attack, complained two weeks ago that al Qaeda terror kamikaze pilot Mohamed Atta had been spotted in a local drugstore with reddened hands -- a condition he thought could be a symptom of cutenacious anthrax.
Another detail the FBI seems anxious to overlook: The widely reported visits by Atta and his coconspirators to Florida airfields where they inquired about renting cropdusters and the size of the chemical loads the planes could disperse.
The bureau seems none too interested in other potential evidence that could tie Atta to the anthrax assault.
"In Florida, agents haven't tested cars or residences used by some of the hijackers, including those of Mohamed Atta," reported the Wall Street Journal Thursday. "FBI officials said testing isn't a priority, because they assume that by now, the hijackers' cars and apartments would have been cleaned, removing any trace of anthrax."
Ken Alibek, who headed up the Soviet Union's biological weapons program said the FBI's "assumption" is wrong. He told the Journal that investigators should be conducting extensive testing for anthrax traces in vehicles used by suspects and in all places that a suspect resided.
Alibek's advice notwithstanding, Special Agent Rene Salinas told the paper, "At this time, there are no plans to go back and check (Atta's car and apartment) for traces of anthrax."
The FBI's belief that so-called domestic terror groups are behind the bioterror scourge is also belied by Friday's reports that anthrax found in a letter sent to Sen. Tom Daschle contained bentonite, a substance weapons experts say is Iraq's signature.
While some analysts point out that bentonite was also used in U.S. anthrax production, the Journal reported Friday that those stocks "were destroyed in the 1960's."
Dr. Khidhir Hamza, a former top official in Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program, also disagrees with the FBI's domestic terrorism hunch.
"This is Iraq," Hamza told CNBC.
"This is Iraq's work. Nobody (else) has the expertise outside the U.S. and outside the major powers who work on germ warfare. Nobody has the expertise and has any motive to attack the U.S. except Saddam to do this. This is Iraq. This is Saddam." (Read NewsMax.com's exclusive report on Dr. Hamza's comments.)
Saturday's news that the Czech government now confirms several meetings betweeen Atta and a top Iraqi intelligence official in Prague last June -- combined with reports last week that bin Laden was able to purchase anthrax from a factory in the Czech Republic -- add further legitimacy to suspicions of a foreign bioterror tie. (See: Osama Bought Anthrax)
Still, as the evidence mounts of al Qaeda and Iraqi involvement, the FBI seems hellbent on looking the other way.
"Ultra right-wing organizations -- including a particular West Coast Group -- have become a key focus of the massive federal investigation into the murderous anthrax attacks," the New York Post reported Thursday.
"Our feeling is the anthrax does not point to an international terrorist group," an FBI source told the Post for its front page report.
The sentiment was echoed by a Washington Post front page report two days later:
"The FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service are considering a wide range of domestic possibilities, including associates of right-wing hate groups and U.S. residents sympathetic to the causes of Islamic extremists," reported Post star reporter Bob Woodward.
What actual evidence does the FBI's have of a homegrown anthrax plot? Not much, at least if published reports are any indication.
Charges against suspected domestic bioterrorist Larry Wayne Harris, who was thought to be targeting Las Vegas with "weapons grade anthrax" earlier this year, had to be dropped after the "suspicious biological agent" he was carrying turned out to be a harmless anthrax vaccine.
At least 20 abortion clinics have been evacuated in the last three years after receiving anthrax threats -- including powdered letters. All turned out to be hoaxes.
The only U.S. prosecution for domestic bioterrorism to date was for a man who had mailed out two suspicious vials along with the note, "You have just been contaminated by anthrax."
Though the threat alone was a crime, the vials themselves turned out to contain nothing more toxic than tap water.
In fact, of the more than 300 homegrown anthrax scares investigated by the FBI in the last three years, all proved to be bogus -- until Sept. 11, that is.
Still, federal probers seem anxious to round up the usual suspects, no matter how unconvincing the evidence. One supposed hot lead currently being pursued: the gun show conection.
"The FBI has been making inquiries about a Nebraska man who for several years has been selling manuals at gun shows that provide information on making chemical and biological weapons," the Wall Street Journal reported Friday. If the FBI thinks the unidentified suspect actually possesses any anthrax, it isn't saying so.
Then there's the ever popular militia angle, which the bureau is reportledy following with little apparent reason:
"In Michigan, FBI agents have met several times since Sept. 11 with Ann Arbor police to talk about the whereabouts and capabilities of local militiamen," the Journal noted. "(There's) some concern that people in that element might see Sept. 11 as a good way to get more notoriety and exposure," the local police chief told the paper.
If these reports reflect the true thrust of the FBI's anthrax investigation, it's clear the bureau has yet to overcome eight years worth of Clintonization, where the only leads pursued were the ones that supported predetermined outcomes.
In fact, the bureau's decision not to test Atta's apartment for trace anthrax seems like deja vu all over again.
Recall the Vincent Foster death case, where FBI agents told Congress there was no need to analyze blond hairs found on his body or carpet fibers on his clothing.
Or Flight TWA 800, where investigators were uninterested in 300 witnesses who said they saw a missile strike the plane.
With blunders like that, it's no wonder Mideast terrorists thought they could get away with anything.
That's my vote, along with a coordinated attack plan.
#2. Who are the terrorists?
Look around you. All the anarchy is being caused by left wing extremists.
All those protestors are left wing.
Protesting Conservative has always been an oxymoron.
Since the attack, the right wing , and the malitias, have been protesting FOR AMERICA!
"to talk about the whereabouts and capabilities of local militiamen"
According to the Constitution, members of the militia are all about these investigating officers, including the very said same Ann Arbor officers of the law.
The F.B.I. has wigged out.
Not to mention, is ignorant of the Constitution.
Like they did for OKC bombing patriots Tim McVeigh and Terry Nickels. When it first broke, all anyone talked about was that Iraqis were responsible for the bombing. Also they were 2 former militia members were they not? The problem here is that if that someone even suggests that 1 militia out there might be at fault, you assume its an attack on all militia. Not so! But I know every element has a lunitic fringe!
The Bush Administration isn't saying much. Looking at "all leads" doesn't mean they are putting Iraq on the back burner... Investigations take time. Why point the finger publically at Iraq yet if we aren't ready to act against them? The media has been spinning the "right-wing hate groups" line. I'm sure many left-wing hate groups are also being investigated. Bottom line, the media has continuously represented their own theories as coming from the Bush administration, even when they didn't.
We're not supporting the terrorists. We vote for the right wing canidates. I don't think anyone here voted for Clinton. Where have you been?
Are you sure they weren't? Or do you just believe what you're told?
I think there is a huge disinformation campaign underway here. I agree with the idea that the US is not yet ready to take on Iraq. Whether this is for reasons to do with the coalition, or military/intel preparedness is up in the air. The administration really seems to doing its best to deflect the blame of this from Iraq.
Another possibility is that the administration knows full-well that Saddam is behind the anthrax attacks. On other threads related to this topic, folks have been arguing that long-standing US policy is retaliation in kind for the use of WMD. Problem: terrorists use "conventional" means (the hijacked planes) to kill thousands of people, and then the terrorists use a WMD to kill only a few. So, even if the administration knows Iraq is behind the anthrax attack, they may not know, at this point, what the appropriate response should be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.