Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This looks more and more like the smoking gun that will be the reason to take out Saddam. Not that there was any question that we had to, anyway.

This despicable tyrant is making WMD for offensive purposes. There is no defensive purpose for making bio-weapons.

16 posted on 10/26/2001 4:37:19 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
There is no defensive purpose for making bio-weapons.

Not to defend Saddam, but actually there is such a defensive purpose. It's to serve as a deterrent against others' using those weapons against you. That's why we developed them ourselves until Nixon's presidency.

30 posted on 10/26/2001 4:56:47 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
This looks more and more like the smoking gun that will be the reason to take out Saddam.

What worries me about this scenario is I've heard Saddam's two sons are worse than he is, and have already made threatening statements if anything happens to "dad". And undoubtedly there is a whole army of this ilk waiting in the wings to take over should something happen to the sons. We'll have to exterminate the whole bunch - that might not be easy.

This may be why the Bush Administation is hesitant to link Saddam to the attacks...they may just be buying time to figure out a strategy. And given the obvious ramifications, I think they want to be as certain as possible of Saddam's connections.

31 posted on 10/26/2001 5:02:10 PM PDT by republicandiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson