[xlib]

Glazov and Horowitz can be forgiven for being somewhat over the top in their reaction to Chomsky, given their respective experiences with real (as opposed to US Academia sanitized) communism. But what about Horowitz's claim that Chomsky referred approvingly and at some length to Horowitz's (pre-epiphany) writings in the early seventies? Chomsky often claims to rely on "evidence easily verifiable by third parties," and gets away with it because he knows most of his devotees won't bother.

[Ridgeway]

Those "third parties" are mostly OP-ED! pieces that don't say what he says they say! LOL