That’s nonsense. Everyone who believes in the terms of the New Testament are the subject of the Bible. If you believe only in the Old Testament, then that’s your business.
Here, see this.......
John 10
15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.
If you don’t believe this, then that is your business. My “homeland” is the United States of America.
1) The events of the Bible (and even the "new testament") take place among Jews in 'Eretz Yisra'el, not in the United States of America which was founded a mere two hundred odd years ago by enlightenment rationalists and freemasons (you know--Illuminati types).
2) You dismiss my rejection of the "new testament" (which I used to believe in, btw; I'm not Jewish) because you cannot defend it on any logical grounds whatsoever. There was already a Bible before the "new testament" was written. The "new" (as in "if it's new, it ain't true") testament had as much authority behind it as the qur'an. You only believe it because it's always followed the book of Malachi. Well it didn't always follow the book of Malachi. Belief in its authenticity is based on the logical fallacy of "affirmation of the consequent," just as is evolution. If I were to ask you to prove to me the "new testament" is from G-d you would only quote it to prove it, and you miss the point that I don't recognize its authority to begin with.
The "old testament" does not authorize the "new" one. The latter can only be accepted dogmatically on its own authority, since no authority for it can be found in the "old testament." And it is because you realize this that you run into a corner and hide.