No. Read the whole thread so you don't post stupidly.
little girl looks suspiciously clean and cute. I really hope the pics are authentic, but I have to suspect it's our own propaganda.
Rnmomof7 wrote:
I never realized that we have an office of US propoganda till the President tried to sell us on the lie that this isnt about Islam
r9etb wrote:
(OTOH, if my wife would allow it, I'd probably try to adopt the little moppet....)
Rnmomof7 wrote:
Beautiful children..fake staged pictures..
also:
BTW none of those children look like they are starving..go to Africa and look you will see what real starvation looks like..
and
Hitler was once a sweet looking child too
you wrote:
Geez, for a registered nurse you sure are bitter and hateful toward children. Did you ever stop to think for a moment that it just might be a litte better, a little more Christian, to feed some kids even if they are the enemy?
I still say:
Nope, still can't find the logic there. Nothing I saw her write before you and the others jumped on her seemed to warrant your criticism. Nothing she said indicated that she didn't like, didn't have compassion for kids. She was questioning the authenticity of the story, *and* whether these children even knew who was feeding them (not that that matters) and whether or not they were starving. My kids are probably about that weight. I would wonder why the food isn't getting to those who really need it more. Someone mentioned a baby that could hardly move. Why didn't they use *those* pics? I don't know.
I also questioned your criticism of Rnmomof7:
?? Rnmomof7 was questioning the authenticity of the pictures, not the value of feeding the children. You made some leap in there that didn't seem warranted to me.
To which you replied:
No. Read the whole thread so you don't post stupidly.
Now you insinuate that I am being stupid because I admit that something didn't seem warranted to me? har.