Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
I don't know what you're talking about.The "Petrines"(Catholic Church)has NEVER denied that Paul was in Rome.The Church has always taught that Paul was in Rome as was St.Peter.You really ought to read a good book on Church History.You would be amazed.
9 posted on 10/17/2001 11:36:50 AM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Lady In Blue
Can you recommend just one or two of the better books about church history!
15 posted on 10/17/2001 11:52:23 AM PDT by DrJasper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Lady In Blue
Thanks for this and your many other posts. It's nice to be reminded of our great intellectual and spirtual legacy in this smugly ahistorical age of ours.
18 posted on 10/17/2001 12:02:20 PM PDT by Hibernius Druid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Lady In Blue
Sorry if I was obtuse.  What I meant to say was that the first three bishops mentioned are assumed to be Petrine, which may not be the case.  There seems to be some evidence that Titus was put in by Paul, not Peter.
21 posted on 10/17/2001 12:55:54 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson