Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHICAGOFARMER
While the court’s decision in U.S. v Emerson was to reverse and remand a lower court ruling that cleared Dr. Timothy Joe Emerson of a federal violation of the 1994 Domestic Violence Act,

I thought people were protected from double jeopardy. It must not have been an argument about guilt of the person but about usage of the law by law enforcement. The media is very vague about this.

58 posted on 10/17/2001 7:39:36 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lavaroise
I thought people were protected from double jeopardy. It must not have been an argument about guilt of the person but about usage of the law by law enforcement. The media is very vague about this.

Emerson has never gone to trial in this case (the court decision was to decide whether the case could even go there). As such, he has not yet been in 'single jeopardy'.

69 posted on 10/17/2001 4:24:40 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson