Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BOBWADE
I totaly agree. Ashcroft can instruct his lawyers to appeal it to SCOTUS but they won't rigorously offer an argument against the case.

No, he can't. The government won, so they can't appeal. Emerson, on the other hand, can, and can spare Ashcroft the embarrasment of picking a case just so he can play to lose. Ironic.

22 posted on 10/16/2001 9:09:31 PM PDT by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: NovemberCharlie
Did the gov't win, sounds like it was remanded and not necessarily reversed. Hard to tell without the actual order to read. I was assuming that the remand was not really a victory for anyone. Have you read the decision? can you post a transcript or link to it? I would be very interested to see it.
24 posted on 10/16/2001 9:24:32 PM PDT by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: NovemberCharlie
Since Emerson won his argument about the 2nd being an individual right I don't think he can appeal that part. Nor would it be relevant to an appeal by him of the parts he lost.
42 posted on 10/16/2001 10:37:08 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson