Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Text of H.R. 3076- September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001
Thomas ^ | 10/16/2001 | Ron Paul

Posted on 10/16/2001 5:25:12 PM PDT by Demidog

September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 3076 IH

107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3076

To authorize the President of the United States to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 10, 2001

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To authorize the President of the United States to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) That the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 upon the United States were acts of air piracy contrary to the law of nations.

(2) That the terrorist attacks were acts of war perpetrated by enemy belligerents to destroy the sovereign independence of the United States of America contrary to the law of nations.

(3) That the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks were actively aided and abetted by a conspiracy involving one Osama bin Laden and others known and unknown, either knowingly and actively affiliated with a terrorist organization known as al Qaeda or knowingly and actively conspiring with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, both of whom are dedicated to the destruction of the United States of America as a sovereign and independent nation.

(4) That the al Qaeda conspiracy is a continuing one among Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and others known and unknown with plans to commit additional acts of air piracy and other similar acts of war upon the United States of America and her people.

(5) That the act of war committed on September 11, 2001, by the al Qaeda conspirators, and the other acts of war planned by the al Qaeda conspirators, are contrary to the law of nations.

(6) That under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress has the power to grant letters of marque and reprisal to punish, deter, and prevent the piratical aggressions and depredations and other acts of war of the al Qaeda conspirators.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT.

(a) The President of the United States is authorized and requested to commission, under officially issued letters of marque and reprisal, so many of privately armed and equipped persons and entities as, in his judgment, the service may require, with suitable instructions to the leaders thereof, to employ all means reasonably necessary to seize outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and its territories the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions and depredations perpetrated upon the United States of America on September 11, 2001, and for any planned future air piratical aggressions and depredations or other acts of war upon the United States of America and her people.

(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.

(c) No letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued by the President without requiring the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President shall determine is sufficient to ensure that the letter be executed according to the terms and conditions thereof.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
The GPO just got this up. It's simple, elegant and most of all Constitutional.

Please contact your representative and Senators today and ask them to sponsor and support this bill.

Go Ron Paul!

And a special Kudos to Uriel1975 who brought this to the attention of a few special folks. This is a Freeper initiated bill. Activism works and you're watching it happen right before your very eyes. Please help us get this bill passed and signed.

1 posted on 10/16/2001 5:25:13 PM PDT by Demidog (rfisk@lycos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uriel1975; tex-oma; MadameAxe; Cato; Storm Orphan; RLK; Illbay; Lurker; Noumenon; Alan Chapman...
bump. Please bump this to anyone you think interested.
2 posted on 10/16/2001 5:28:24 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Ron's cool but this is a waste of time. We're already doing the right things to get the scumbags in Afghan. Let's role!
3 posted on 10/16/2001 5:31:07 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra
role - hahahaha
4 posted on 10/16/2001 5:37:31 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra
Is the word 'marque' pronounced as two syllables or one. Anyone know what it means. And why is it call Letters?
5 posted on 10/16/2001 5:38:35 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Demidog; Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator
H.R. 3074 - Air Piracy and Reprisal Capture Act

As an aside, why in the world did this post get pulled from Breaking news? This is breaking news. The text of the bill just became available. This is a Freeper Effort that has resulted in the submission of a bill in the House of Representatives. What is more breaking then that? White powder?

6 posted on 10/16/2001 5:41:41 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
It's an 18th century version of 'bounty hunters'. If we didn't have a standing army, it might be a little more amusing.
7 posted on 10/16/2001 5:43:39 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra
It's an 18th century version of 'bounty hunters'. If we didn't have a standing army, it might be a little more amusing.

Sometimes what appears obscure is the most lethal weapon!

8 posted on 10/16/2001 5:48:38 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
This has got to be the biggest waste of effort in the history of the country. It's almost laughable. My own congressman here in Texas, Joe Barton, wrote me an e-mail after I contacted him about this last week, in which he said that he thinks Paul's legislation is "unnecessary and, frankly, dangerous."

Why are mercenaries needed when the U.S. and Britain have 30,000 troops waiting to march into Afghanistan after the Special Ops guys do their work.?

I fully expect to see Ron Paul, flanked by Demidog and his minions, marching into the House someday in white powdered wigs, knee pants, black buckle shoes and monocles.

Why don't you guys start a theatre company if you want to play George Washington?

Meanwhile, keep the cowboys out of the way of the professional military.

9 posted on 10/16/2001 5:49:09 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
And sometimes it is just a ditsy idea that will garner no more that 12 votes in Congress.
10 posted on 10/16/2001 5:50:48 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Amen, to that.
11 posted on 10/16/2001 5:51:43 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Don't be so thoughtless. You don't understand the Act.
12 posted on 10/16/2001 5:56:22 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
It is pronounced "mark" and it means "retaliation" or "reprisal". The way it works is, back in the day when the US didn't have much of a standing army or navy to speak of, the Constitution allowed Congress and the Executive to issue Letters of Marque to private citizens, basically authorizing them to act as they see fit against some nation or group perceived to be an enemy of the United States - it was useful back in the day when merchant ships usually had a couple of six-pounders on board anyway, just in case ;)

So, you'd go and ask for one, and the President or his aides would give you, literally, a letter (hence, "Letter of Marque") authorizing you to beat the holy hell out of the Barbary Pirates (or whatever) in the name of the United States, and away you'd sail. Anyway, like KingKong said, think "bounty hunters" and you've pretty much got the picture...
13 posted on 10/16/2001 5:58:38 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
Why don't you guys start a theatre company if you want to play George Washington?

Even though previous conversations with sinkspur have proven fruitless, I'll try again for the less daft members of the audience:

Some of us here on FR actually like the Constitution and are not afraid of the fact that the Founding Fathers were pretty smart people.

They set up a way to handle War against entities that were not Nation-States. Letters of Marque and Reprisal were the mathod. Since we haven't had to use them for a while doesn't make them less necessary. This is the right way to proceed, regardless of your ill-informed viewpoint, sink guy (like Clinton).

15 posted on 10/16/2001 6:00:10 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra
Bounty hunters don't have jacka$$ lawyers blunting their spears at the last moment from the other side of the globe.

Do you suppose Mr Paul could sneak in a bill requiring everyone else in Congress to read the Constitution, with little quizzes once a week?

16 posted on 10/16/2001 6:02:58 PM PDT by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
It's pronounced "Letter of Marque" = "Letter of Mark"

As explained, it's an old fashioned bounty on their heads. Govts did this in the days of priacy, hiring private ships and crews to hunt down the pirate ships and kill them and their crews or bring them back home to decorate a ships yardarm.

The Constitution specifically allows the government to issue Letters of Marque for situations where a full military response isn't necessarily appropriate. We have companies in this country that are all former seals, special forces, army rangers etc that make VERY capable mercenaries. Mercenaries to hunt down Mercenaries :)

Godspeed

17 posted on 10/16/2001 6:06:54 PM PDT by America's Resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
This practice was outlawed by the Hague Conferences over 100 years ago.

We signed it.

This is illegal and stupid.

18 posted on 10/16/2001 6:08:02 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You're wrong. We didn't sign it. We are under no obligation to give up our ability to deal with terrorism even if we had signed it.
19 posted on 10/16/2001 6:11:20 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: amundsen
We were not supposed to have standing armies.

Yeah, and the world stopped in the 18th century.

Nothing in the Constitution prohibits standing armies. In fact, the Constitution expressly provides that Congress shall maintain a Navy.

20 posted on 10/16/2001 6:12:05 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson