For all you doubters, there is no slope close enough to the object to cause the altered depth perception you say makes the man looks small and the object so large.
I'm an avocational archeologist, a flint-knapper, and an amateur (semi-professional, award-winning) outdoor photographer.
The cobbles (rounded worn stones) in the lower picture are much larger in relation to the man, than they are in the top picture. The lower pic is doctored, if it is the same ordnance or fuel tank.
The question is? Who did it? Would the slime-ball liberal press stoop this low? It's very easy to do on a computer with a digital photo. But I'm not going to argue my point ad infinitum and possibly make a fool of myself :)
Either way, it definitely is NOT munitions.