Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

HONK! HONK!
1 posted on 10/14/2001 3:35:29 AM PDT by StoneColdGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: StoneColdGOP
See also: Florida judge rules waitress can sue Hooters in toy Yoda case
2 posted on 10/14/2001 3:41:36 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
Who is handling Hooter's public relations? Forrest Gump? It's pocket change, give her the car!
3 posted on 10/14/2001 4:18:12 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
ROTFL
5 posted on 10/14/2001 4:36:28 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
What is a Hooter and where are they located?.
7 posted on 10/14/2001 5:13:12 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
A Toyota? A Toyota? Try again buckwheats. This woman deserves whatever car she cares to get at these clowns expense after there stupidity has became apparent by Hooters taking this to court. They annied up to open the game, but she has 4 aces and should play the hand for all it's worth - goofballs deserve to be cut deep.
11 posted on 10/14/2001 7:36:39 AM PDT by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
This one's pretty clear. The Hooters' manager thought he'd win on the prevailing Beavis & Butthead Nyuck-Nyuck Book of Case Law. That book of case law states that any joke between any two adolescently-minded males that is bought into by any female shall be enforceable by law.

In other words, if you have little more than a room-temp IQ, if you appreciate a good joke on someone who doesn't deserve it, if you think that the female breasts are "where the action is," and if your idea of "good clean fun" is humiliating any nearby female, then anything you do is protected by law.

In my opinion, this manager had in mind whom he wanted to win the competition. Had "she" won, she would have gotten the car. It was a girl already sharing her "favours." However, the game went wrong and the girl who WASN'T putting out actually won. The girl who thought she'd sewn up the new car was pissed and cut the manager off. So the manager, acting out of spite (and trying to get Ms. Tricks back in the folds of the bed) tries this Toy Yoda routine.

In other words, the manager was trying to use the company to pay off the gal he'd been boffing. He was sure she'd win. But she didn't. The girl he COULDN'T GET won. He tried to stiff her and she sued. The manager is the prick, and now the company is stuck trying to defend him.

This manager will have a very short shelf-life.

Michael

13 posted on 10/14/2001 8:35:40 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
Reminds me of a radio promo years ago. The Rolling Stones were touring, so the station was offering "Dinner with the Stones" that weekend.

With the winner on the line, the called up the Stones. "Hello, is this Mr. & Mrs. Stone?" "This is Dr. & Mrs Stone's residence..."

The winner, a girl, knew almost before the second syllable of "mister" got out that she was, well...

14 posted on 10/14/2001 8:45:48 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StoneColdGOP
I have read her entire lawsuit and concluded that at certain times, she has a couple of outstanding points.
17 posted on 10/14/2001 11:55:50 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson