Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I prefer 20 megaton fallout myself. IMHO, of course.
13 posted on 10/13/2001 8:43:01 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
Some of these would work for me.

...snip... The B61 family of weapons can be configured with a wide variety of yields, including 0.3, 1.5, 5, 10, 45, 60, 60, 80, 170, and 340 kilotons.7

In recent years, many military strategists have advocated the deployment and use of very small tactical nuclear weapons against Third-World adversaries, especially in earth-penetrating roles.8 The two lowest yields of the B61 family lie well within this so-called "mininuke" range. The percent of blast energy converted into shock waves in the earth is extremely sensitive to the depth of the blast. Thus even a small increase in earth penetrating capability can greatly affect the military utility of a nuclear weapon to hold deeply buried and hardened targets at risk. Hardening of the B61 to allow very high altitude release, with consequent high velocity ground impact, apparently provides such an increase in capability...snip...

14 posted on 10/13/2001 8:59:43 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: meyer
I don't believe that anyone would have any problem with underground nuclear testing, do you? We need to test some of our old 50 megaton behemoths. See if they still work.
21 posted on 10/13/2001 10:01:35 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson