[Diogenesis]

Given that I trust the US Navy, and US labs more than you,

you might either read the literature or go back under your rock.

[r9etb]

you might either read the literature or go back under your rock.

ROTFLMAO!!!! D-man, I think you'd better read the man's resume, and then apologize.

[Gordian Blade]

I personally know a first-rate researcher who was tasked with determining the validity (or not) of Cold Fusion claims at a well-known and respected laboratory. He found absolutely nothing after spending considerable time and resources. He gave me a brief review of the claims and his work, and I'm convinced he is right. Most (by far) mainstream physicists agree with his side of the argument.

Now if you're talking about controlled fusion using lasers etc., that's another topic and in line with accepted knowledge of nuclear reactions. I'm talking about "Cold Fusion in a Jar" as first proposed by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons.

If you want to read more about this, try the following link:

Scientific American Comments

And let's keep the personal stuff like crawling under rocks out of it, OK? This is just a scientific discussion.