Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gordian Blade
So I figured, but the hows and whys are always edifying ;)
17 posted on 10/10/2001 1:10:38 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
Gravity is actually very well understood, at least until you get down to time/distance scales and energy levels not seen in the universe since the first microsecond of the Big Bang, or perhaps at the centers of black holes. Unlike the electromagnetic force, which has positive and negative charges so there is a possibility of shielding one sign of charge with the other, gravity is caused by mass-energy density which is always positive, according to Einstein's theory. So by everything we know as it applies to ordinary matter, including superconductors, gravity can't be shielded. Einstein's theory of gravity has passed every test so far, at least as it applies to the ordinary objects in the NASA study.

There has been some theoretical discussion of exotic matter that has negative energy density. It's fun to play around with the possibility and construct (in imagination) things like wormholes that you could walk through to transport instantly to another place and time. However, no evidence of exotic matter actually existing has ever been found.

Gravity is the weakest force in the universe, so it is very difficult to measure directly. The only reason we feel gravity at all is that the other forces tend to cancel out at large distances (compared to the size of an atom or molecule). Small changes in gravitational force are even harder to measure.

Like Cold Fusion, the supposed gravity shield experiments depend on measurement of very small quantities in the presence of a lot of experimental error. It's easy to make a mistake and see something that isn't there because you want to see it. There are lots of examples in the history of science: N-Rays, Canals on Mars, Cold Fusion, etc. (Dare I add the Face on Mars?)

I once had a proud inventor send me a motor design that he claimed put out 100 watts of mechanical power for 99 watts of input electrical power, giving you 1 watt of power for free. It turned out he had a very efficient design so that the mechanical power output was almost (but not quite) equal to the electrical power input. His methods for calculating and measuring the respective powers were inaccurate enough so that it looked like the output power was slightly greater than the input power, but the difference was smaller than the errors in his methods.

It may seem like traditional physicists are too quick to dismiss things that don't fit their narrow worldview, but it's actually just a function of the checks and balances at work when scientists verify each other's studies. Occam's Razor applies unless definitively ruled out. As the late Carl Sagan liked to say, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

36 posted on 10/10/2001 1:48:25 PM PDT by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson