[OWK]

Oooookay, then why is it NOT okay to have laws against driving drunk that include blood-alcohol restrictions? That's "pre-emptive," right?

The public (being owner of the roads), IS entitled to establish the terms and conditions pursuant to access of their property. INCLUDING restrictions on operation of a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol. I have never suggested otherwise.

[Illbay]

Sorry. I thought you were one of the big "battlers" for the right of drunks to own the road. I apologize.

But see the post from Physicist, above.