Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: harpseal
A gram negative anthrax would be a designer bug in her opinion.

A gram negative anthrax would be an impossibility. The gram stain procedure is designed to differentiate the exposed peptidoglycans in the cell membrane. A gram positive organism has exposed peptidoglycans, whereas a gram negative organism does not.

This defining cell wall characteristic is inherent to the organism, and defines it's metabolic characteristics as well. If the organism is gram negative, then it is not bacillus anthracis.

Anthrax is also a comparatively large organism (among the largest) and is distinctive in this way as well.

73 posted on 10/08/2001 6:59:57 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
I defer to your superior micro biological knowledge. The reference to a designer bug was something that otherwise axted in the same maner as anthrax but was a man made organism. She said she did not even know if it was possible but she had stated that gram negative was not anthrax even a selectively bred anthrax.

Sorry for any confusion biology was never my strong science.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

142 posted on 10/08/2001 8:37:15 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson