To: Wallaby
Why wouldn't they want to take information from a reporter who had sworn witness statements implicating . . . others in the Oklahoma City bombing Their own files would indict them for killing McVeigh too early and failing to act on substantive leads in the "anti-terrorism" campaign they elected to shunt instead toward measures as included in the omnibus Package for the People?
4 posted on
10/07/2001 6:42:57 PM PDT by
Askel5
Nah, couldn't be
There wasn't a Newsweek Cover titled: "Why does Timothy hate us so much?
6 posted on
10/07/2001 6:45:48 PM PDT by
D-fendr
To: Askel5; Jim Robinson
Hey A5. I was just going to check how I did text boxes on "Is the Blood Trade Responsible for the Origin of Aids?" and it is 404'd again. What gives?
7 posted on
10/07/2001 6:48:57 PM PDT by
Wallaby
To: rubbertramp
An FBI sketch of John Doe No. 2 resembled a Samara employee who described himself as a political refugee who had served in the Iraqi army. The TV station did not name him and digitized his photos to hide his identity. Later, Hussain Al-Hussaini came forward and said he was the man identified by several witnesses as possibly being John Doe No. 2, and sued the station and Davis for defamation and libel, saying he could be easily recognized from their coverage. (Al-Hussaini withdrew the state case, and a federal judge dismissed a second case; Al-Hussaini has appealed.)
21 posted on
10/07/2001 7:34:03 PM PDT by
thinden
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson