Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER: DETAINMENT ISN'T ENOUGH
Yahoo! news ^ | 10/03/2001 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/03/2001 6:17:08 PM PDT by Pokey78

House leaders recently rejected the Bush administration's request for authority to detain suspected terrorists indefinitely. Under the House plan, the government could hold immigrants suspected of terrorism for only seven days without bringing charges.

Let's hope seven days is enough for the government to perform a thorough intelligence-based investigation of a million Muslim immigrants!

Oddly, it would be easier to deport immigrants than to detain them. Under the Constitution, visitors to this country have no right to be here, but they may have a right not to be detained indefinitely without a hearing.

War is being waged on our soil by noncitizen infiltrators, legally admitted by the INS. If Congress says the attorney general can't detain them, we ought to deport them. (From the "not ready to move on" file: Isn't it curious that we have room for 19 Muslim mass murderers, but no room for an innocent little Cuban boy? In addition to deporting immigrants from terrorist-producing countries, someone should look into deporting every person who ever worked for the INS.)

Any senator (Teddy Kennedy) who is opposed to the mass deportation of immigrants from suspect countries would be free to waive in as many potential terrorists as he could sign his name to. At least then we'd have true government accountability, rather than collective foot-dragging based on pristine tributes to civil rights.

We won't even necessarily need to call on the fine-tuned screening procedures of the INS. The law could simply state that immigrants from certain countries aren't allowed to be here after a certain date, unless they receive a waiver.

Admittedly, fanatics willing to launch monstrous suicide missions are probably also going to be willing to violate a general order of deportation. But it would raise the terrorists' transactions costs. At the very least, noncitizen terrorists will have a tough time maneuvering around the country, becoming pilots, getting hazardous materials licenses and generally doing the things they need to do to nuke Manhattan.

Surely, thousands of immigrants could be waived in instantly on the basis of reliable evidence either that they are not Muslims, or that they are the peaceful, law-abiding variety not planning mass murder -- as opposed to the peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who recently slaughtered thousands of our fellow countrymen.

Among the advantages of a deportation presumption is that it would give the FBI (news - web sites) increased opportunities to flip Muslim immigrants to informants -- a possibility unlikely to be lost on any terrorists looking for their own new recruits.

A mass deportation order also ought to ease the way for "ethnic profiling." If noncitizens from various suspect countries were under an order to leave, all security personnel would have grounds to look for potential violators of that law.

Everyone is profiling now anyway. No one talks about it, which allows liberals the luxury of ritualistically denouncing racial profiling. Ordinary Americans aren't going to die for political correctness. And airlines aren't going to fly empty planes.

The facts are: (1) Nineteen male immigrants of Middle-Eastern descent recently murdered thousands of civilians on our shores in a coordinated attack; (2) other people answering to the same description have been apprehended in the country as suspected co-conspirators; and (3) according to the attorney general, there are more sleeper terrorist cells at large that the government has yet to identify.

Complaints about heightened suspicions toward people who fit the description of fanatical Islamists go well beyond opposing indiscriminate hate. It is a demand that Americans not even have their antennae up.

Focusing on men of Middle-Eastern appearance is less "profiling" than suspect identification. It is in keeping with the standard police practice of not looking for people over 6 feet tall when the eyewitnesses tell you the perp is 5 feet 2 inches. When looking for the Unabomber, I promise you -- the FBI wasn't rousting Asians or Arabs.

As unfair as it sounds, deporting immigrants from suspect countries will actually minimize cruelties toward vast numbers of vaguely Arabic-looking people. Although many immigrants will be swept up unfairly, all the Sikhs, Hindus and Arab Christians will be relieved to discover they don't scare people anymore.

To be sure, there is a risk that mass deportations might upset the delicate diplomatic maneuvering designed to bring the largest possible number of unsavory regimes into our "international coalition." On the other hand, some countries in the "international coalition" might be forced to conclude that the Great Satan is smarter than they thought. This part of the plan ought to appeal to their primitive sense of honor and boundaries.

But moreover, any sentient being has to realize that some of our "partner" regimes are more plausibly allied with the terrorists. If we don't stop the coalition-building soon, Colin Powell (news - web sites) could soon be announcing a "diplomatic initiative" to bring Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) into the "coalition." Having allies is great, but let us not forget that it is ultimately our responsibility, not that of foreigners with different interests, to defend this country.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2001 6:17:08 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
One Bump!!

And, TWO big sloppy wet kisses for Annie!!

2 posted on 10/03/2001 6:23:39 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Fabulous. Ann cuts to the chase better than anyone around. NRO's loss.
3 posted on 10/03/2001 6:27:13 PM PDT by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting this.

I agree 100% with everything Ann says.

4 posted on 10/03/2001 6:28:33 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
TWO GUN ANNIE, Go get em gal. Annie calls um as she sees um, my kind of gal.
5 posted on 10/03/2001 6:30:19 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Super Bump

"Lets Roll"

6 posted on 10/03/2001 6:30:39 PM PDT by Licensed-To-Carry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
BUMP OF COURSE
7 posted on 10/03/2001 6:31:57 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Ann leaves the girly-boys in the dust!
8 posted on 10/03/2001 6:32:42 PM PDT by hillsborofox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW;Ann Coulter
That's my Girl!! Way to go, Annie!! You're back on track,, just keep tellin' it like you see it. The reason the 'girly-boys' are runnin' is 'cause they're scared of intelligent women!!
9 posted on 10/03/2001 6:40:51 PM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Yep she is 100% right. Lets go further and kick out those christians because they teach their children its ok to kill doctors who preform abortions. Next lets get the NRA members because after all if they own a gun or support the rights of gun owners then they must be violent people so they gotta go as well.
10 posted on 10/03/2001 6:46:00 PM PDT by Libertarian_4_eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hillsborofox
USS Ann Coulter fires another salvo - directly on target!

Go gett'em gal!

11 posted on 10/03/2001 6:47:23 PM PDT by johnpaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
bttt
12 posted on 10/03/2001 6:49:05 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Ann seems to have gotten worse since this thing started. Ann shouldn't have been kicked off National Review. But at the same time, she comes off as xenophobic these days. May I suggest that she tone it down for a bit?
13 posted on 10/03/2001 6:54:50 PM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Ideal Woman = Ann Coulter.
14 posted on 10/03/2001 6:54:58 PM PDT by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
My kind of gal, Ann Coulter is...
15 posted on 10/03/2001 6:55:42 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This part of the plan ought to appeal to their primitive sense of honor and boundaries.

Does Ann have any boundaries these days in her writing? Again, she shouldn't have gotten the boot from National Review, but this is crazy......

Some of you are encouraging her in this endeavour.

16 posted on 10/03/2001 6:58:42 PM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Its scary that Ann is the only one making any sense these days. One lone voice. Oh well, keep it up Annie. I'm with ya!
17 posted on 10/03/2001 7:07:35 PM PDT by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I'm in love. Way to go Ann!
18 posted on 10/03/2001 7:10:38 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian_4_eva
?
19 posted on 10/03/2001 7:12:42 PM PDT by 1stMarylandRegiment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But moreover, any sentient being has to realize that some of our "partner" regimes are more plausibly allied with the terrorists. If we don't stop the coalition-building soon, Colin Powell (news - web sites) could soon be announcing a "diplomatic initiative" to bring Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) into the "coalition."

Since Powell isn't President, I get the distinct feeling that Ms. Coulter is saying that President Bush is either a girly-man or stupid. I disagree with both characterizations.

I agree with many of her points in this article, but at the end she just goes too far, again. I for one am glad that she is not our leader, she is wound way too tight at the moment. And, stating that she is being sarcastic is a coward's position, anyone can say they didn't mean it literally. She sure sounds serious to me.

20 posted on 10/03/2001 7:13:13 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson