Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale;JudyB1938
FYI. Notice how everything that is 're-evaluated' turns out to always be older than previously stated.
2 posted on 10/03/2001 12:18:38 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blam
FYI. Notice how everything that is 're-evaluated' turns out to always be older than previously stated.

I dont understand, what exactly was re-evaluated, according to this article?

6 posted on 10/03/2001 12:26:25 PM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The older you and I get, the less long ago 30,000 years seems. 300 people who each lived to 110 could represent the entire period. Only 300 lives. If each were 105 and each taught a 5 year old everything, names, dates, places, and the 5 year old did the same in his turn, we could have an oral tradition going all the way back. 300 isn't many. 30,000 years isn't much.
10 posted on 10/03/2001 12:36:44 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson