Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angelo
I never meant to suggest that the first amendment is binding on NRO. That private concerns may honor freedom of opinion and speech or not do so is clear and I didn't need to be reminded of that. That NRO chose not to do so in this instance does not, in my opinion, reflect well on them.
139 posted on 10/02/2001 10:32:09 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: All
Can someone please provide a link to Ms Coulter's original article? Thanks.
144 posted on 10/02/2001 10:35:33 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: Aurelius
That NRO chose not to do so in this instance does not, in my opinion, reflect well on them.

Now that is a fair criticism.

152 posted on 10/02/2001 10:40:23 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson