[HEFFERNAN2]

This is a terrible idea...all this will do is muddy up the water with alot of wannabee's. We have Spec Ops we don't need a bunch of "cowboys" getting in the way. Semper Fi, Mike

[Mr. K]

I respect your opinion, but I think this is a good idea- he is not going to sleep well knowing even his own guys will be thinking about $1 billion reward.

This could even by 'psycho ops' for all we really know...

[AngrySpud]

"This is a terrible idea"

Can you imagine how many COUNTRIES would like to earn a billion-dollar bounty? Osama hasn't got a prayer now. We don't have to wait until the time is just right for us to act and take him out on the first strike ... the job will be done FOR us, and alot cheaper than it would cost us to do it ourselves.

[spindoctor]

Why not just let the bounty hunters get the first crack at it? These guys are ruthless. They'll do it for the money and the thrill of it all. Our military can wait a while longer.

[537 Votes]

This is a terrible idea...all this will do is muddy up the water with alot of wannabee's. We have Spec Ops we don't need a bunch of "cowboys" getting in the way. Semper Fi, Mike

Last time we deployed Marines against Muslim terrorists, we lost, 238 to 1.

If a 'bounty hunter' wants to save us some trouble, let him go ahead and try.

[Revelation 911]

Agreed - this will probably seen as a license to Rambo types

[RedBloodedAmerican]

I think you have a valid point. See my post right above this one.

[Libertarian_4_eva]

The special ops and our government has had 8-9 years to look for this creep I don't care how or who gets him.