[general_re]

Peace-niks are objectively pro-terrorist.

Logic's the same, argument's the same.

Am I to assume that your splitting of semantic hairs means you have no objection to the logic behind the statement?

[getoffmylawn]

Am I to assume that your splitting of semantic hairs means you have no objection to the logic behind the statement?

Peace is truly a wonderful thing. I've often been at complete peace with both my life and the world. I don't consider pointing out that peace does not equal terrorism to be a splitting of semantic hairs. I do consider equating peace with terrorism to be shallow, irresponsible, and in my opinion, just down right stupid.