Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
Conservatives blame liberal judges for putting criminals back on the street -- not for the creation of criminals in the first place. Methinks you haven't really thought through your premise ...

No, in both cases (the WOD and soft judges), the govt's actions result in more crime, even if we all blame individual criminals for individual crimes.

Does a soft on crime judge bear any responsibility for crimes committed by thugs he turns loose?
80 posted on 09/28/2001 9:37:28 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: sendtoscott
He certainly does bear some responsibility because he's supposed to know that a hardened thug is going to commit more crime. That's what judges are for... to provide public safety by keeping thugs locked up. If he won't do that, he has no business being on the bench. That's the responsibility that government bears.
82 posted on 09/28/2001 9:43:03 AM PDT by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson