Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
Still, normally, we look at the policy first and the article looks at the people supporting the policy and attacks the policy based on the fact that the neocons support it, and not on the merits of the policy itself.

The goal of going after the terrorists is not an itemized action plan. Agreeing with a policy is not the same as underwriting just any insane plan with an ostensibly the same goal.

89 posted on 09/27/2001 2:55:07 PM PDT by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: madrussian
The policy is "cooperate on hunting down terrorists or face war". That logically applies to any country. The Neocons point out that Iraq is likely to fail the test. Here comes Buchanan saying, "Oh, no, since the neocons suggest that, it can't be right".
91 posted on 09/27/2001 3:01:12 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson