Unlike anyone else with a public pen, Pat succinctly defines once and for all the differences in what is believed to be American "Conservative" agendas. It is obvious that the predominant voices among FREEPERS are those of the "NEO-CONSERVATIVES." It is NEO-CONSERVATIVES who are in staunch support of Israel and on record as being the most vociferous in weapon-rattling assertions, in advocating to take on militarily all of Israel's enemies - and in most vehement opposition to the PALEO-Conservative position, that would oppose such Israel-favoring reaction to the recent terrorist actions. - And Pat Buchanan represents this "paleo - classical" form of CONSERVATISM, which focuses on primary AMERICAN INTERESTS. For this reason NEO-Conservatives are the ones who during the last presidential campaign proclaimed " Pat Buchanan as -- "UN-ELECTABLE!!!" A term by its intent so outrageous that it is in conflict with the very roots of our American system, a term of the most UNDEMOCRATIC and un-fit definition in a free society, regardless whether or not Buchanan would have met my or anyone's standards as a candidate. But never before has the term "UN-ELECTABLE" pre-empted a national campaign. The proclamation of "UN-ELECTABILITY" needs the strongest scrutiny: by WHOSE standards, WHO decides what qualifies "electability !?" I have yet to see NEO-CONSERVATIVES being challenged on this outrageous label - a methodology designed to simply de-qualify a candidate in a system that is designed to let the Nations' People make such decisions - and not a handful of political strategists. Such lack of scrutiny is just one more symptom of our MAINSTREAM MEDIA representing NEO-CONSERVATIVE interests.
The opening article clearly states Pat Buchanan's PALEO-CONSERVATIVE opposition to Israel's cause and effect on our foreign policy, he explains the international hatred that has been triggered by US NEO-CONSERVATIVES' support of the JEWISH STATE and Zionism in general. And this article clearly explains the reason of NEO-Conservatives' passionate rejection of Buchanan - and his PALEO-CONSERVATIVE agenda.
Basically wars really end when (1) The entire enemy population(s) is/are destroyed, or (2)When countries are occupied by the victors. It would be complete insanity for America to try either with the entire billion people who claim to be Islamic.
Attacking people who are no part of a problem will not work. That's what the terrorists did on September 11, and the entire US is now against their cause.
We must protect ourselves, then find political, economic, and other means prevent more recruits for international jihad causes around the world. There must be a universal rule of law where all governments will not allow terrorism and will diligently cooperate with the rest of the world to eliminate it.