Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DB
It is by no means clear that dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to persuade the Japanese to surrender. Remember that there was in place a demand for "unconditional surrender", put there by Roosevelt, and the Japanese had been told the terms would include their giving up their Imperial system. The latter condition was understood to have provided them with their primary motive to hold out in spite of recognizing their loss as inevitable. Once they had been bombed, they were allowed to keep their Emporer.
268 posted on 09/25/2001 7:24:40 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: Aurelius
The "big three" had discussed demanding unconditional surrender and decided against it at a conference (which conference escapes me now, sorry, its the wine again). FDR used the phrase "unconditional surrender" after that conference anyway, and out of 'unity', Churchill and Stalin decided to go along with it. THAT is why we made that demand - it was not a thought out government decision.
269 posted on 09/25/2001 7:36:57 PM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson