All right Hank, I'll do what I can. During his last posting day here on FR, Demidog had an entire thread dedicated to him by his old arch-enemy CSAZ (currently posting as Imberedux). A quick search of the archives reveals that this thread has been quietly pulled, but I'll give you the run-down from memory. CSAZ broke the "don't carry arguments across threads" rule by dedicating the "treason defined" thread to Demidog. The ol 'Dog handled it well and tried to engage in honest debate (as always). He didn't name-call, he didn't flame, and as far as I know he didn't break the rules. What I asked the Admin Moderator to do was to prove that I was lying by sending me the offending post that got Demi whacked. I followed that thread and didn't see any, but I could be wrong. In the event that I'm wrong, and the moderator can prove it, I will publicly say so.
That's what I asked of him. I'm not playing "prove a negative" games. Just looking for some reasoning. If I was wrong in what I said, I'm not above apology.
So.... Was I wrong?
I didn't see this thread, so I can't say whether this is correct... But, if this is true, I hope demidog e-mails Jim and requests to be reinstated. Many of us, myself included, have gotten "timeouts" for going over the line at one point or another. I hate to see a longtime freeper banned long-term over something that happens in the heat of an argument. Heck, if A+Bert can be reinstated time after time, there is hope for all of us!