Anyway, to paraphrase him would not do his self-bannishment justice and it would be difficult to select any one, or ten, things to mention. He started the process with his first thread shortly after the attacks and continued to work diligently in that direction until he succeeded.
However I raise this point: there are many reasons people inquire into the reason behind someone's banishment. Although there are those who would like to scream and bark at the moon about management decisions (hence turning the forum into a meta-discussion that becomes irrelevant to the stated purpose) many people want to know so they have an example of what not to do. Most long time posters that I know who are concerned about such things are not interested in spitting in Jim's face and having their posting privilages revoked, but rather in gaining a better sense of what is not acceptable. When the reasons are not apparent for certain action, speculation abounds.