I completely understand the difference. You read demidog's comment: "I actually have stated that I think that it might be wiser to abolish child-porn laws." Do you agree or disagree with his position? I think that his stance is extreme, and is not accepted by most libertarians, who would view the marketing of child porn as an exploitation of and violation of the rights of minors. Surely you do not believe that a six year old can give consent?
Now, tell me more about my "modus operandi", or withdraw the insinuation. I think you must have me confused with someone else.