[malakhi]

where did Demidog advocate legal possession of child pornography?

Here is just one example:

No. I suggest that images depicting real crimes, if discovered, should be followed as far as they can as leads. I do not think that the person in posession of them be prosecuted unless the pictures provide evidence that the person posessing them is a perpetrator of the crime.

Here's another:

I actually have stated that I think that it might be wiser to abolish child-porn laws.

Do you need more examples?

[malakhi]

See my #214.

[another1]

While these are both controversial statements, they are not the same as what was attributed to the absent poster. That is a particularly cheap shot, when the person named is unable to defend, clarify, or put into context any previous comments.

[Osinski]

Quote someone out of context when they are unable to clarify their statements and call it proof?

What a cowardly act.

[LowOiL]

Your post 214 is gold. Thank you.