Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins

Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."

The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.

It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.

It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.

The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)

On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.

Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.

The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.

Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."

The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.

Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.

It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."

The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.

September 24, 2001

Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-503 next last
To: Admin Moderator
This is a false statement. Knock it off.

I'm sure you can document that. You claimed I uttered a false statement, now you're faced with the opportunity to prove it either here, in FReepmail, or at harryc@tcia.net. I anxiously await the proof.

Thanks in advance,
Callahan

341 posted on 09/24/2001 1:23:53 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Why does it bother you so that Lysander Spooner was stauchly and morally opposed to the institution of human slavery?
342 posted on 09/24/2001 1:25:10 PM PDT by Jolly Rodgers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Mercuria
With the National I.D. proposal and the development of a Homeland Security Squad...

Its amazing, isn't it? Just two weks ago, the mere mention of these things would have had most FReepers stocking up on ammo, and there would have been few or no threads about anything else. But now with President Bush's "with us or against us" comment, I fear they will be accepted and passed all too easily.

343 posted on 09/24/2001 1:28:15 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
"He was banned for his political views."

That is an excuse, you might as well say he was banned for very poor taste. In reality, he banned himself.

344 posted on 09/24/2001 1:28:15 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Hi Jim,

Good to see you here.

I'm glad that this was posted, and if it wasn't I'd post it.

Its your site, but I thought that Free Republic was to promote freedom, not the State. Our very own CIA is responsible for the Saddam Husseins, and Osam Bin Ladens, not "foreign powers." This is a big gift to the power hungry in Washington, and they'll use it to increase their powers and decrease our liberty. Your site will eventually fall for "the benefit of society" if the homeland security crowd has its way.

You see, they don't need security for the nation - they can't provide it anyway. They want security for the government, and that means eventually shutting down both FreeRepublic and LewRockwell.

I like both sites, but I've been spending my time at LewRockwell more than here, because this place smells strongly of Fascism at the moment. I'll be back more often when the hysteria subsides.

Thanks

345 posted on 09/24/2001 1:28:35 PM PDT by IMHO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Rodgers, Roscoe
Why does it bother you so that Lysander Spooner was stauchly and morally opposed to the institution of human slavery?

Because Spooner wanted individuals to put a stop to slavery with force, instead of relying on the holy and sacred government (that killed hundreds of thousands in the "War to End Slavery"), just like gun controllers want you to rely on the govt instead of defending yourself by force as an individual.
346 posted on 09/24/2001 1:29:17 PM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
It is my impression that like many of today's terrorists, John Brown was motivited more by a pleasure in hatred for its own sake and a joy in killing, than in any humanitarian principle. He deserved to hang. However, many people of the time, still admired today, supported him, Thoroeau, for example. I am sorry if Spooner was among them.
347 posted on 09/24/2001 1:34:16 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Spooner advocated terrorism. Predictably, many of his advocates oppose our government's fight against modern terrorism.
348 posted on 09/24/2001 1:35:36 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy,Spirit of Truth,uvular,backhoe,Inge_CAV
FYI
349 posted on 09/24/2001 1:35:47 PM PDT by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Thoreau. Have to be careful.
350 posted on 09/24/2001 1:36:11 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob, amundsen, IRtorqued, Snow Bunny, Brian Allen, Jeff Head
FYI
351 posted on 09/24/2001 1:36:50 PM PDT by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Don't wait too long. Life might pass you by.
352 posted on 09/24/2001 1:37:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
In reality, he banned himself.

This is vague and non-specific statement. Do you know what Demi said or did that that resulted in his banishment other than the cryptic "he banned himself?"

353 posted on 09/24/2001 1:39:14 PM PDT by diotima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye, gfactor, sweetliberty, sneakypete, balls, t-shirt, Revel, Mercurias
FYI
354 posted on 09/24/2001 1:39:20 PM PDT by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
I read Free less now than ever before..not becuase of censorship...but because too many liberals have landed here and are allowed to post to suit me!
355 posted on 09/24/2001 1:45:05 PM PDT by D. Miles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Spooner advocated terrorism.

Spooner advocated "private" violence for a cause most conservatives credit Lincoln for furthering by using "public" violence (i.e. the abolition of slavery). Why was the Civil War more moral than just slitting a few slave owners' throats?
356 posted on 09/24/2001 1:47:11 PM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Geez...if he thinks it's "poisonous" here, he ought to check out some of the newsgroups on Usenet and see what they are saying. FR is nearly tame in comparison.

357 posted on 09/24/2001 1:50:01 PM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diotima
Do you know what Demi said or did that that resulted in his banishment.....?

Careful Dio, you're treading on some thin ice with this one. One must stick with mindless groupthink during times of crisis. Or hadn't you heard?

Kindest regards,
Callahan

358 posted on 09/24/2001 1:52:05 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Osama also likes "private violence" directed against civilians.
359 posted on 09/24/2001 1:52:58 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: DB
>>>Have you seen the article linked on reply #101?

>>>It's a good one... If it hasn't been posted it should.

>>>111 Posted on 09/24/2001 06:40:27 PDT by DB

===============

Okay, DB, you piqued my curioristy. That link goes MSN/Slate. Then when I clicked "Back," those folks have put in a trick message on the button that says "Back to Unfree Republic."

Anyways, I thought "Slate" had been closed down due to huge losses or lack of interest.

So, is that a Microsoft site? If it is, I think ALL MSFT stockholders here should let Gates know that we don't approve of OUR company's money being used to support childish, name-calling organizations like "Slate."

Of course, Gates DOES think he's a DEMOCRAT. It's just amazing to me that someone as intelligent as Gates could do something so stupid as to donate to the DNC.

mike

360 posted on 09/24/2001 1:55:38 PM PDT by bikermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson