Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins

Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."

The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.

It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.

It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.

The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)

On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.

Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.

The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.

Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."

The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.

Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.

It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."

The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.

September 24, 2001

Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 501-503 next last
To: Abundy
No flames here my man, and not neccessarily an ally either. Just wanted to make the point of our last "Brush with "Terrorism"...

I'm sure most on this thread were not, or are not aware of the past terrorist bills that were passed in the GOP led congress. Not a single line of text in those bills stopped what happened here on the 11th. But, no law abiding citizen can aquire certain weapons any more.

The article above is BS, but the errosion of our rights for security is a reality. Bit by bit, little by little...I guess I need some foil too aye??

SR

221 posted on 09/24/2001 10:18:14 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

Comment #222 Removed by Moderator

To: JAWs
Yes. And had allied leaders played their cards right, they could have manipulated the same situation between the Nazis and the Soviets in the 30's. Harry Truman is supposed to have said, concerning such a missed opportunity, "...and we would have aided whichever side was losing at the moment".
223 posted on 09/24/2001 10:19:06 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
You didn't read his column or my response, apparently. If you did, you have a terrible problem with reading comprehension. Try to argue with what I said rather than with what you wish I had said.
224 posted on 09/24/2001 10:19:46 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
It's pretty simple numbie...

"Define us."

Terrorist exterminators!

" Define them."

Terrorists and their sycophants!

The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed!!

An Armed Citizen, Is A Safe Citizen!!

No Guns, No Rights!!

Molon Labe!!

225 posted on 09/24/2001 10:20:41 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
I appreciate all of your comments on this thread. I'm hopeful that the vigilance=treason mentality will soon die down.
226 posted on 09/24/2001 10:21:11 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

Comment #227 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Robinson
Jim,

Pacifism is durable due to its malleability; at the risk of mixing metaphors, the willow bends while the oak thunders to the ground, groaning in its desperate struggle all the while.

America has grown fat since the success of its earlier wars against tyranny and insidious influence; we have embraced nonsensical notions such as multicultural egalitarianism, while slumbering slovenly on our Serta Sleepers purchased on the installment plan, we are now more underbelly than backbone.

Standing on our hind legs will prove difficult enough, shaking off the sleep that clouds our eyes collected over these 50 years in order to focus on the enemy both within and without so as to move against those who've so callously disturbed our rest will take giant steps, we dare not stumble.

Prudence ought always temper passion; but when the way is clear, it is time to press on to the end, we may never rest so easily again.

228 posted on 09/24/2001 10:26:48 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #229 Removed by Moderator

To: Twodees
Wait until the demand for a declaration of war is really pressed in Congress. Part of the deal from the left side of the aisle will be a demand for another Sedition Act as a price for agreement to declaring war. You can bet on that. The traitors will want cover in time of war, when the price of treason is to be paid at the end of a rope. They'll want any criticism of government suppressed so that evidence of what they've done can't be used to get them out of office.

I'm not certain I understand what you think "the left side of the aisle" has done. Support for open borders and Muslim "freedom frighters" has not come primarily from the left. (BTW, same goes for our policies with regard to China.)

230 posted on 09/24/2001 10:28:38 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Old Hickory
I recently read the book "Creature from Jekyll Island" by G.E. Griffin about the Federal Reserve. That is where I read an account of the affair of the Lusitania. According to Griffin, the captain of the Lusitania survived and gave the information on how the ship was deliberatly set up.
231 posted on 09/24/2001 10:29:37 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

Comment #232 Removed by Moderator

Comment #233 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
I do not apologize for my screen name. If you're too sensitive to deal with it, write the management. The only people who have complained about my nick are those that are either anti-war socialist leftists or overly paranoid tin foil right wing extremists who do not agree with me. Either way, I'm not moved to change anything. I'll modify opinion with logical thoughtful discussion, but otherwise you may whine away.
234 posted on 09/24/2001 10:34:12 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
There's a big difference between loyalty to country and letting politicians get by with wiping their backsides on the Constitution to cover their own treason.

Rare is it that so much is said with such clarity and brevity.

235 posted on 09/24/2001 10:34:13 AM PDT by Storm Orphan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
Well, goes both ways. If Lew Rockwell, et al, think that I or a majority of the FReepers are FOR national ID cards, they're nuts. We are for the Constitution and our individual rights. That's the whole purpose of Free Republic. But we are also going to defend our nation and we are going to defend our fighting men and women and we are going to do whatever we can to defend our citizens at home. And, no, we do not believe that you can pacify the terorrists or the governments that harbor them. They must be rooted out and destroyed.
236 posted on 09/24/2001 10:34:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
[They're not missed.]

(cackles spinkie as he gathers his little clique for the next round of "bait and hit abuse button".)

237 posted on 09/24/2001 10:35:15 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
I'm hopeful that the vigilance=treason mentality will soon die down.

Me too. The atmosphere around here is eerily reminiscent of the post MFJ bloodbath. Some of the names have changed, but the "beat and crush anyone who dares to question anything we say" mentality is just the same, and more easily justified within our new state of "war."

238 posted on 09/24/2001 10:35:37 AM PDT by another1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Oh, and I've never been banned. So please if you're going to attack me, be accurate. And if this nick gets banned, have no fear, your opinions are muted bye the solid middle which supports the war effort now, and thankfully at that.
239 posted on 09/24/2001 10:36:35 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
If you had to choose, which would you choose, Freedom or security? Would you put your Freedom in the hands of people you don't know just because they say the things you want to hear?
240 posted on 09/24/2001 10:36:51 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson